this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
371 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18904 readers
3343 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The blockbuster remark came moments before closing arguments in Trump's second trial in a case brought by E. Jean Carroll

A federal judge threatened Donald Trump's attorney Alina Habba with jail time on Friday, after the former president's lawyer kept contesting a ruling after it had been issued.

"You are on the verge of spending some time in the lockup," senior U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan warned. "Sit down."

The bombshell remark came moments before the start of closing arguments in Trump's second trial in a case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 90 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When will this woman be disbarred? We should start taking bets.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think they disbar lawyers because they terrible at lawyerng.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 7 points 7 months ago

If professional wrestling has taught me anything, it's that someone has to be the heel.

[–] Nunar@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

She's gunning to be his next wife.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Fourth Lady of The United States

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If we're going by presidential succession we actually don't have a Fourth Lady because the President Pro Tempore of the Senate is a woman.

(I know what you're saying and it's funny I just wanted to say this)

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Quoll_Strife@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

There's nothing wrong with sex workers, don't use it as an insult.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I just read that she considers herself a very devout Christian. She has also been divorced and remarried less than a year later. What a garbage person.

[–] pandacoder@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That checks out. Exactly what I'd expect from a devout Christian.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Threatened over and over but doesn't actually do anything. Which is why they keep doing whatever they want.

[–] Quoll_Strife@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

This is the final final final final warning, once more and I'll warn you for good.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Don't be such a tease, judge. Do it already!

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sending her to jail does nothing other than rile up his base and give him grounds to declare bias. I'm glad the judge has a better grasp on this than you do.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So we just let them continue breaking the law so as to appease fascists? Yeah that's a terrible idea

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago

No, it's the exact opposite. I don't give a shit if she spends a couple of days in jail for being annoying in court. I want to make sure the rulings against trump, the rapist and insurrectionist, are unimpeachable.

It's overreacting to petty shit meant to antagonize that is going to let them get away with breaking the actual laws we all actually care about.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I get it, but there has to be a point where the rule of law isn't held hostage by "riling up the base". People get pissed that there's two justice systems, one for the rich and another for everyone else - so because this rich asshat can throw cannon fodder idiot performative lawyers out to gin up the base, he gets kid gloves?

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I get it, but there has to be a point where the rule of law isn’t held hostage by “riling up the base"

100% agreed. That point is far beyond a lawyer being annoying in court, imo.

so because this rich asshat can throw cannon fodder idiot performative lawyers out to gin up the base, he gets kid gloves?

Ignoring this is so the punishment given to him is unimpeachable. If she puts his lawyer in jail, it's easier on appeal to claim bias. It's the whole point of the move, and it would be bad judgement by the judge to jail her...it's like grabbing the little fish and thus letting the big one get away.

[–] S_204@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

She's good looking and now famous, nothing will happen to her other than a spot on television.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Her makeup and outfits are well-applied, but most anyone with a shred of self-respect would chew their arm off if they woke up next to her naked Picasso after a bender.

[–] MadMonkey@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

I volu teer as tribute. (jokes I love my current SO vv much)

[–] politicalincorruption@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I thought the legally blonde sequels were over. Why is this fall from grace trope playing out?

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Don’t insult the legally blonde franchise like that.

[–] politicalincorruption@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it’s a spinoff; Illegally Fake Blonde with a low budget actress.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Or she could be the anti-Elle, who thinks that just because she's pretty she can get away with being a terrible lawyer, and Elle needs to teach her that impeccable style and grooming may be important, but that being a lawyer is about a whole lot more than knowing which shoes go with which purse.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

She's not naturally blonde. That's a bottle. Look at those roots.

She’s a perfect cast character in the Faux World franchise.

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago

Tbf legally and naturally are not synonyms.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

is it really a threat if there’s no chance it will actually happen?

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Oh his underlings can definitely take a fall. He's left a wide swath of them in his wake. I'd be happy if they just disbarred her.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 7 months ago

Oh god, this is getting better and better.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why is that idiot not disbarred?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

The wheels are turning on that, but the wheels turn slowly.

But it's not because of this. These are just shenanigans and Kaplan doesn't have patience for shenanigans.

Documents have come to light that she once implied to a former staff member of Trump's golf course that she was representing her in a sexual harassment (what else?) settlement when she was really representing Trump. That's a thing lawyers get disbarred for.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

When you hire your lawyers based on the size of their boobs and not based on the size of their brains

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I suspect he picks them based on the size of their willingness to represent a work for a client famous for not paying people, who has a substantial amount of his assets supervised by courts because he lost a fraud suit, whose attorneys have a habit of pleading guilty to felonies they committed on his behalf or being disbarred, who seems largely incapable of listening to legal advice, or keeping his mouth shut in the name of self-preservation

[–] Jagger2097@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've heard it's not hard to fake being smart

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Kaplan ain't buying it.