Fujitsu isn't shying away from taking the blame on this which is interesting. Are they legitimately just "doing the right thing" or is there a benefit for them to just own this?
United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
Possibly attempting some "we've changed now" reputation-saving. They have no hope of winning any cases against them, and probably not even of minor points of the cases.
It's been well known that Fujitsu are to blame, there's no benefit to them pretending otherwise and fighting any of this. I think they've put aside money to help with compensation claims as well so I think it's reputation damage control and for the sake of future projects they are doing this. On some level, it's at least good to see they are doing this but I do wonder why they didn't before.
Also, Fujitsu being open about the issues forces the Civil Service and the government to be open as well. Clearly Fujitsu are to blame but so are those other two.
They've been lying about it for over 25 years. This is because the evidence against them is now overwhelming and the only option left is to admit it.