We don't know each other and I don't know how to help you and others in a similar situation, but I've just read this:
Sarah McBride makes history as first transgender member of Congress
Maybe there is also a faint spark of hope today.
We don't know each other and I don't know how to help you and others in a similar situation, but I've just read this:
Sarah McBride makes history as first transgender member of Congress
Maybe there is also a faint spark of hope today.
Just a question: Where can you see the voter turn out rate in this and possibly past elections? I can't find that.
Oregon governor Tina Kotek ready to deploy National Guard if needed to combat election violence - (archived)
In an email to the Capital Chronicle, spokesperson Roxy Mayer said any voter intimidation or criminal acts aimed at undermining the election would not be tolerated and that the governor’s office is closely monitoring the situation, working with local, state and federal agencies to ensure Oregonians can safely vote.
Yeah, that's not new, but I feel there are still many who are unaware, although I don't understand why.
I feel this is too simplistic. There are apparently parallels to Nazi Germany's ideology, and the Nazis represent without doubt one of the worst regimes in human history. But they didn't 'invent' this. Their racism, their hatred, and their view on women whose place is 'in the family' has been here for much longer, and it is by far not limited to the 'Western' world (in China, officials go from door to door urging women to become pregnant, just to name an example, and a recent UN study found that one in eight women and girls alive today experienced rape or sexual assault before they are 18 years old).
One thing I'm missing in this discussion is the role of men in the family. No one appears to talk about that, at least not publicly. (Just stumbled upon this 1 min video.)
But that's just my opinion. Also, I'm not a historian or sociologist, so take this with a pinch of salt.
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell (video, 8 min)
"The issue of the day on the campaign trail was the stupidest person who has ever run for president, telling American women… what he is going to do to them, whether they like it or not.”
A scholar from Berkely has been investigating the possible impact of Project 2025 and Trump's pissible second term on the environment:
The plan contains an extensive description of how they would constrain the reach and breadth of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by limiting enforcement and shifting its focus to what we sometimes call compliance assistance. In this role, the EPA would work directly with companies to try to help them reduce their environmental impact, but would move away from enforcement. This model has been tried federally under some Republican administrations and the absence of enforcement has repeatedly resulted in significant environmental degradation.
The effort to break up [NOAA] is part of a strategy of hear no evil, see no evil: If you don’t report on climate change, then perhaps it doesn’t exist.
It's a good Q&A with Ken Alex, Director of Berkeley’s Center for Law, Energy and the Environment (CLEE).
Thanks, @OpenStars and @Vodulas