From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
Solus as the Almighty Todd says "it just works" And that comes from someone which always has at least one problem, that problem being gaming.
It aint solved mind you but it works marginable better on it.
Example, anno 1404, no matter what distro or silly protondb config, or if I use a new steam profile or fresh distro , works.1 out of 10 times.
But Solus, it just works, no hoop jumping needed
Artix.
LMDE, MX, Ubuntu etc are based on Debian. Mint is based on Ubuntu, so Debian. Chimera/Endeavour are based on Arch, etc.
In the linux world, you have a linux kernel, systemd or init, a bunch of gnu utils, a window system like X or Wayland, whatever DE you want (Xfce, gnome, kde, name it) and a packaging system (apt, yum, pacman), but for me, it's all the same.
If you want something different, try a BSD distro then? FreeBSD, OpenBSD, GhostBSD, etc
How do people feel about Garuda? I put it on a laptop to try it out. I'm still undecided.
I love using Alpine Linux on my server. Super light and quick to start up.
I've become a fan of KDE Neon. It's based on Ubuntu LTS but with the the most up-to-date KDE release.
Annie Linux, but sadly it doesn't exist yet.
Been using Xubuntu 23.10 recently, but I'm kind of a distro hopper. I need ROCm and some other special (proprietary, ehh) tools that require RHEL, SLE, or some Ubuntu flavor. I also like having a working out-of-the-box configuration. I've used openSUSE Tumbleweed and Arch Linux before, might try it again but it's a little bit complicated to me.
Favorite? No. Most acceptable: NixOS.
The worst documentation of a linux distro I have ever encountered, but the declarative model has convinced me I don't want something else. Now I'm just waiting for other distros to pop up that are declarative as well. (Guix? No thanks, I'm not a fan of endless parentheses)
CrunchBang++, BunsenLabs, Bodhi, Antix and Peppermint.
EndeavourOS
Void - https://voidlinux.org/
Was scrolling through to see if anyone had mentioned void. I use Fedora these days but Void is great because of how easy it is to contribute to with its GitHub-based package management workflow - anyone can update a package or introduce a new one, it just needs to be approved. It doesn't get any easier than that
Kali Linux! Just too useful, though there can still be some fixing around.
Fixing?
Bodhi Linux. Lightweight and beautiful
Ubuntu is so easy to use!!
Toaster Linux or Nobara.
Guix is imho beyond normal distros, and I'm never going back to Manjaro or any of the normal distros.
I like Poky. But for other use case than Arch, Debian and Fedora.
Rocky
Manjaro KDE for me - it's not Arch per se, otherwise Ubuntu would also be eliminated for being a derivative of Debian...
Puppy Linux.
Puppy with what underlying distro though?
Puppy has their own but can be based on a lot of the main distros. I've used it to recover data from many a computer.
I've been enjoying Mint personally for my laptop. I've tried Ubuntu but I've had issues with the speakers :/
Yea ubuntu breaks a lot atleast for me it does
Ublue although it's kinda still fedora, otherwise alpine even though I don't really use it.