this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
638 points (97.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21428 readers
1600 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 154 points 11 months ago (3 children)
    [–] Norgur@kbin.social 98 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    In the middle of our screen

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago
    [–] neonred@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

    My mouse is your mouse (and your mouse is mine)

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_NKQ-qoYx84

    [–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 87 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Technically this post is illegal until tomorrow, but I dig that.

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 108 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It's tomorrow in some places 😂.

    [–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Yeah but the IP was held by an American Company.

    Happy New Year.

    [–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    Would using a VPN make posting it from NZ illegal right after midnight if the IP is logged from a country not past midnight?

    [–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I love that we're having a whole hypothetical discussion about this. I think the time in the timezone where the rights were held probably took priority over the time for the poster of the image at the time of upload. Regardless of what timezone you post from, it would have been posted before midnight for Disney and the relevant courts.

    [–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

    That sounds to me like it's probably correct. 👍

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago
    [–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)
    [–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago
    [–] recapitated@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

    They used to be

    [–] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Not really. I think it's considered free speech if it's sarcastic or a parody.

    [–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Free speech doesn't apply to Intellectual Property at all, or rather you're free to say whatever you want but you can still be sued for anything that you say.

    What you're thinking of is "Fair Use".

    [–] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 11 months ago

    Thanks for the clarification.

    [–] ADTJ 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    " If Disney sues, we'll claim fair use...

    Ho hi! "

    [–] janus2@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago

    "hi ho, hi ho, it's off to court we go..."

    [–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago

    And fair use exists to protect free speech.

    [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

    Yes, the infamous "sarcastic" exception to copyright.

    [–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    It's still illegal. This version of Mickey Mouse is still covered under trademark law.

    [–] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    What do you mean? What part of this infringes on copyright?

    [–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

    Trademark. Not copyright. And the part that is covered is Mickey.

    This could also be covered under copyright, since the only Mickey that went into public domain is the one from Steamboat Willie, not this one. I'm not a lawyer, though.

    [–] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

    This is the one from steamboat willy though

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
    [–] lapommedeterre@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

    As of 2024, Micky is now public domain, at least the variant from Steamboat Willie.

    [–] digger@lemmy.ca 80 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Show us the hands! Willie, in the public domain, doesn't wear gloves. Mickey, still Disney IP, does wear gloves.

    [–] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 66 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Mickey is ready for your prostate exam.

    [–] ADTJ 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Yet somehow the Steamboat Willie version seems more likely to give you said exam whether warranted or not

    [–] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

    Dr. Steamboat Willie: "Take off your pants and put them on the chair with mine."

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣... got me laughing so hard i woke up my wife in bed 🤣

    [–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Did she enjoy the comment as much as you did?

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    Of course not... weirdos never get satisfaction.

    [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago

    It's hard being a weirdo...

    [–] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Let me clarify, only the Steamboat Willie version of Mickey Mouse characters are in public domain, not the recent versions as Disney holds the copyright. In a few years, more Mickey Mouse shorts will become public domain.

    [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Personally, I don't give a shit about whether Mickey Mouse is copyrighted or not. What I care about is all the other works that were kept from entering the public domain because Disney was constantly getting copyright extended.

    [–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

    What's funny is that Disney built their empire largely on public-domain works (such as fairy tales), but when it's their turn to give back, they fight it tooth and nail. Classic getting to the top and then pulling up the ladder behind you.

    [–] detalferous@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago
    [–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    I've heard an argument that a reason why Disney has pushed Steamboat Willie lately (new intro for Disney Animation films, and a lot of merch) is because copyright law works differently from trademark law. They can still claim a trademark even if the copyrighted work is in public domain. I'm not a lawyer, but if that's not all BS, I don't think we have to worry about anything like this anytime soon.

    [–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 11 points 11 months ago

    I am a lawyer, and that is correct. You can use old Mickey for general purposes, but not as a mark.

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

    Meeh, it's just a joke. It would be an aimmediate downer for me if I was a fisrt time xfce user.

    [–] DaBPunkt@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    AFAIK you can only claim a trademark-violation if someone is (for example) selling stuff (so you couldn’t sell stuffed animals that look like an early Mickey for example).

    [–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 11 months ago

    A trademark just has to be "used in commerce as a mark". In layman's terms, that basically means distributing goods or services with it as a logo or a name. A stuffed animal could be infringement, but using something a logo for your software is much closer to the classic infringement fact pattern.

    [–] Null@pawb.social 13 points 11 months ago

    Love this and now I'm expecting wallpapers for my xfce build.

    [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I get it ... but idk if I want Disney on my mind when thinking about xfce

    [–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    XFCE is the Mickey Mouse under the desktop environments?

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

    I hope not...