this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
140 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
188 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

given the scrutiny around Tesla, it's interesting this story doesn't seem to have come out sooner since this is a fairly novel workplace accident

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryan@the.coolest.zone 56 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Important context autotldr missed:

The incident happened when the engineer was programming the software that controls the robots, which cut car parts from aluminium, The Information reported.

Two of the robots were disabled, but a third was inadvertently left on. As it went through its normal motions, it caught the worker in its claws.

Yikes, that should be checked multiple times before someone gets close to the clawed aluminum cutting robot. Failure of process, I suspect.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Lock out procedure wasn't followed properly. You're supposed to check that equipment is in a safe state before you go into a dangerous area like that.

[–] mars296@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes but if for example management is pressuring employees to make repairs in X amount of time that causes them to have to rush, its the company's fault. Similar to Norfolk Southern giving train engineers 45 seconds per train car to do safety inspections.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Almost one in 21 workers at Tesla's Giga Texas factory was injured on the job in 2022, according to The Information, compared to the industry average of one in 30.

It’s almost like they have some systemic issue with safety and procedures or something…

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Average is one in 30? Wild. The P&G plant near my house was at a few hundred days with no incidents recently. For Tesla to be doing even worse than 1/30 tho? Yikes

[–] aard@kyu.de 2 points 10 months ago

The Tesla factory in Germany has roughly 3 times as many reportable incidents as comparable factories.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Another way to look at it is that the average manufacturing worker has a safety incident every 30 years.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It could also be that they are better about reporting incidents than other employers. I'm also curious what they mean by "the industry" if they mean automotive manufacturers or manufacturing in general. I work at a plant that makes parts for heavy equipment, which is similar to automotive, but obviously not automotive. We've had 2 recordable incidents this year. One of which was due to someone not wearing their issued cut resistant gloves while handling metal scraps and then needing stitches. There wasn't any reason for them not to wear their gloves except for laziness or complacency.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

Over here in Aus we like to have a “as few maiming’s as possible” policy. You say laziness and complacency, I call it a national disregard for worker safety, an underfunded & toothless OSHA and union-busting, all caused by unchecked capitalistic greed.

But let’s get back to this particular incident. For a start, here’s an article from 2021 about a system to allow robotic arms (and others) to sense human presence and not cause injury to them. So what, Mr. Elon “Autopilot” Musk couldn’t have designed a similar system for his factory? Hah, no, he just doesn’t give a fuck. This article goes into it in more depth. The Fremont Tesla factory had an even higher 1 in 12 injury rate last year. Also, yeah nah, they failed to disclose dozens of injuries. And these two rates don’t account for them. Still don’t believe me? Here’s a paper comparing Tesla to the automotive industry average. It cites it’s source as the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

But you should absolutely congratulate your colleagues. Assuming there’s more than 41 of them, you did better than Tesla! 👏

CW: first four links contain fake gore

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 8 points 10 months ago

Occupational hazard. Doesn't mean said engineer isn't owed compensation though. On the contrary.

[–] nebirus@beehaw.org 17 points 10 months ago

Considering the subject matter, perhaps the auto-TLDR bot has a conflict of interest!

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 20 points 10 months ago

Is this the same Tesla plant that has no caution stripes because Elon hates yellow and black? Or the one that violated EPA regulations? Not surprised in the slightest

[–] beepnoise@beehaw.org 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact, back in 2018, Tesla factories have less safety signs and signals because Elon Musk hates yellow (so no safety tape telling people where not to stand) and cannot stand the beeping noise forklifts make when they reverse.

Source: https://revealnews.org/article/tesla-says-its-factory-is-safer-but-it-left-injuries-off-the-books/

Absolutely baffled how more people aren't killed at Tesla factories, tbh.

[–] zhunk@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

This is kind of tangential, but white noise backup alarms are neat.

[–] Thevenin@beehaw.org 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm an engineer who works in an industrial environment, and I regularly have to repair or reprogram hazardous equipment. Here are a few takeaways I got from the descriptions of the Tesla incident:

  • Lockout/tagout was not being respected. If you don't have a lock, yank the fuse and stick it in your pocket. But whatever you do, when working on a machine, you must maintain exclusive control so nobody activates it while you're inside the approach boundary.
  • Why was the engineer in the approach boundary for a "software update?" I feel like I'm missing some important context there.
  • Where were the hazard indicators? A hazardous device needs sound or light indicators, so nobody forgets they left it plugged in.
  • Where was the machine guarding? If it can kill you, entering the hazardous area should shut the machine off with or without LOTO. I'm partial to interlocked gates, but cordons and light curtains are popular for a reason.
  • If the machine guarding was disabled, where were the observers? The last time I activated a machine with the light curtains overriden, I had three other engineers on standby, one at the E-Stop, one with a rescue hook, and one just to watch.
[–] Thevenin@beehaw.org 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In addition, while some companies try to blame workwrs for recordable incidents, safety is always ultimately management's responsibility. Safety controls or procedures missing? That's management's fault. Workers disabling safety controls out of malice or hubris? Managment is at fault for hiring them. Workers so overworked and tired they don't notice mistakes while operating lethal equipment? Management. Workers having to choose between having a job and doing it safely? Management. Lack of safety culture? Management.

With power comes responsibility, and in modern corporations, management has all the power.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago

I worked IT for a machine shop a while back and one of the giant machines had a sign posted next to it :

"This machine has no brains, so use yours"

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

SORRY, I THOUGHT YOU WERE ELON MUSK. END STATEMENT.

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

This is what happens when you promote a robot to manager.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why are we building robots with claws?? That seems like a bad idea.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

When they grab you with their metal claws, you can’t break free. Because robots are strong, and they’re made of metal.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Was that Bender or Star Wars?

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Part of the Star Wars Trek, not the Star Trek Wars.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryThe robot "pushed its claws" into the man's body and drew blood from his back and arm, two witnesses told US technology website The Information.

After another worker hit the emergency stop button, the engineer managed to escape the robot's grasp and fell down a chute designed to collect scrap metal, "leaving a trail of blood behind him", one of the witnesses said.

The incident happened when the engineer was programming the software that controls the robots, which cut car parts from aluminium, The Information reported.

Read more from Sky News:Apple fears 'irreparable harm' after watch sale ban'Pints' of wine to be sold in Britain for the first time

The Texas site has been Tesla's global headquarters since 2021, when chief executive Elon Musk announced he was shifting the company's home from California.

Musk's SpaceX rocket company also has a launch site at the state's southern tip, and he moved to Texas in 2020.


Saved 42% of original text.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago