this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
650 points (97.1% liked)

Memes

45737 readers
1034 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 90 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Confirmed Windows user, lol

[–] Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I’m a Mac user and let me tell you, it could easily be an osx device. Those friggin updates take forever, and can be forced on you with no warning.

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mac updates are weirdly slow.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Full Mac updates not only usually update the entirety of the system and then run an SIP check, but often are firmware updates for the hardware, that’s why they now have a separate setup for quick security updates, which often happen in the background, without a full update required: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102657

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

Thanks! I suspected they were doing something under the hood but they are not as overtly transparent in this process.

[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Good info, thanks.

Any idea why it takes so long to install the OS from a fast USB drive (around 45 minutes)? The same drive installs win10 in under 5 minutes.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Good question. Honestly I’m not sure. Windows installs wipe an NTFS partition and then dump the filesystem there, bootloader is installed and OS boots, job done. My only guess would be that the Mac installer individually hashes every file for security and verifies on write. While ensuring a perfect install and secure OS, it also leads to wildly long install times.

[–] theUnlikely@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

I think you've got a setting wrong. I've got mine set to download only. So it just downloads the update in the background and notifies me. I have even left that notification sitting there for months before without it forcing or nagging me.

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can turn off automatic updates, but it will still give you a notification when there is one so you can make it update at night.

Also, OS X? Is the OS 10.X or you're just referring to it as OS X. Because in newer macOS versions, I can confirm the automatic updates do it at night when you're not using the computer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That ignore system messages. This post will be anecdotal, but I can't ever get my systems to suddenly restart or reinstall the bloatware apps like some people claim theirs do. It honestly seems like it's "power users" fucking with things that they don't actually understand, and then complaining that things aren't working the way they expect.

We have 5 Windows 11 systems in our household, and 2 family members that are terrible with computers. None of them act the way some randoms on the Internet claim Windows 11 does with updates all the time. And everyone I personally know doesn't seem to have these issues either. But we're also not installing random patches or messing with settings that don't have a natural and intentional UI element.

All of our systems I help with for family and friends update on their own, and prompt when a restart is needed, including a button to delay the restart. If ignored, it prompts after a day or so again and only if ignored or delayed for an extended period will eventually give a countdown to a forced restart. I only noticed the countdown because I was explicitly trying to reproduce what people online claim about it suddenly restarting while using it. And at that point it WILL restart even in use, but that's after an extended period, multiple days, of ignoring notifications about it.

I also don't have issues on my systems with those annoying bloatware app links (like Candy Crush) reinstalling, etc. on their own. I turned off the various advertising settings in the settings menus and uninstalled the app links like normal. They've never returned.

Since I've been completely unable to reproduce these relatively common complaints on multiple systems myself, I can only assume people are adjusting settings or installing various patches from the Internet that mess with things that aren't intended to be user-facing and that ends up causing issues. Like the infinite number of patches to remove telemetry, etc. that people don't know what's actually being changed by it, but install for privacy.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Agreed.
I'm a professional IT tech and see a lot of desktops during the week including my own.
We have some Windows PCs that still had 1809 installed because Windows does not manage to update itself without being forced to search.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I mostly agree with you. But something like 3 years ago, I remember letting my PC run while I was gathering seats over night. There was no previous "restart now" or even "update now". However, in the morning, I found the PC had restarted too install an update. And that was the standard setting back then. I changed it to only prompt that there are updates since, and AFAIR that setting was "reset" 1 or 2 times ever since in an update.

But seeing how absurdly niche what I do is, I doubt that random users will care. And sadly they need to be forced to update for the sake of all of us.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a Linux user, I cannot relate

[–] Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

As a Windows 10 user who only enabled security updates neither can I.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

As an Amish person where am I and how did I get here.

[–] Buttons@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You're using what people usually call "the information super highway".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 51 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m here to make sure most comments here have the word “Linux” in it.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd just like to interject for moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!

[–] quazar@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago
[–] Huschke@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)

After switching to Linux a month ago, I can finally participate in the circle jerking:

Forced updates? Haha lol. That's such a Windows user thing to say.

[–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

> chad GNU/Linux respecting my preferences.
> only updates when I do sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade.
> finishes updating kernel and 150 packages in less than 5 minutes whilst I'm merging a pr.
> I close computer when I'm done, unaware of updates.
> open it up next day and it starts like nothing happened.
> mfw I read this post

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My update failed for some unforeseen bug in the software

nixos-rebuild switch --rollback

Back in business as if nothing happened

[–] xarexyouxmadx@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

Maybe it's because I use Linux but I can't relate (anymore). So glad I'll never have to sit through another forced windows update 😌

[–] hondaguy97386@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago

Confused in linux?

[–] semnosao@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 11 months ago

linux user be like: loser

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago

I might be a Linux user but Nvidia makes sure it takes forever to boot when there's a new update. Fuck you Nvidia

[–] frobeniusnorm@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I use linux, but can somewhat relate because i have a weird AM5 motherboard that shows 0-4 minutes of "DRAM ERROR" before posting

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that's a bios option. Your ram is retraining for maximum overclock. Turn it off. Live with the 1% slower performance.

[–] frobeniusnorm@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hate to break it to you, but no. I turned every option regarding cpu or ram overclocking off and it still won't post stable. Doesn't matter, i am a cs phd, so i pretty much start the system in the morning and shut it down before i go to bed, this way i just have to start it before getting coffee :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago

Something something Linux user, btw

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At least now, when you do "update and shut down", it will first restart to actually completely finish the update and then shut down again.

[–] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Impressive!

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a Windows user, I can't relate lol I don't have this happen to me

[–] VindictiveJudge@startrek.website 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Seriously, does anyone know about the update settings? It's not hard to make Win10 not try to update while you're using it.

[–] hamburglar26@wilbo.tech 4 points 11 months ago

And at least since Win 10 the updates take maybe 5 minutes unless you have held them off for months.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It's easier to never learn anything and complain that an OS has issues you didn't bother to learn how to overcome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trollception@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Never had an update take 2 hours. Maybe if your using a computer from 2005.

[–] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 14 points 11 months ago

I had an update take 3 and half hours on a 2019 laptop with a ryzen 5 3550h, 16gb of ddr4 ram and an nvme ssd.

So I moves to gentoo where if unlucky and qtwebengine needs to comiplie the update takes 5+ hours. 😌

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›