this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
22 points (95.8% liked)

Abolish the Monarchy

124 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Well Charlie boy, handing your pedo Andrew over to the police would be a good start.

[โ€“] snaprails 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure that's not an "historic low". In 1642 it was at least 50% and that went soooo well, didn't it? The monarchy is not the cause of this country's current ills, most people agree it's not important so why bother with the hassle of changing it, whatever you replace it with will almost certainly be worse (just like last time). I realize that's probably an unpopular opinion around here ๐Ÿ™‚

[โ€“] spittingimage@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Queen Elizabeth II was a gracious, dignified monarch. Her son is a big tit.

Yes, she was almost 'the nation's Grandma'; Charles is just an evil landlord.

[โ€“] rah 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gracious and dignified in her obscene wealth and unelected, corrupt power.

[โ€“] spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it makes you feel better, she's dead now.

[โ€“] rah 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't. Another of 'em's taken over the obscene wealth and unelected, corrupt power.