Probably a little of both, but I really don't think there are very many practical applications for current AI technology. You can make bad drawings or bad writing in bulk, and those are both niches which have been overflowing with human contributors for centuries at least.
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
25 points (90.3% liked)
Actually Useful AI
1997 readers
7 users here now
Welcome! 🤖
Our community focuses on programming-oriented, hype-free discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) topics. We aim to curate content that truly contributes to the understanding and practical application of AI, making it, as the name suggests, "actually useful" for developers and enthusiasts alike.
Be an active member! 🔔
We highly value participation in our community. Whether it's asking questions, sharing insights, or sparking new discussions, your engagement helps us all grow.
What can I post? 📝
In general, anything related to AI is acceptable. However, we encourage you to strive for high-quality content.
What is not allowed? 🚫
- 🔊 Sensationalism: "How I made $1000 in 30 minutes using ChatGPT - the answer will surprise you!"
- ♻️ Recycled Content: "Ultimate ChatGPT Prompting Guide" that is the 10,000th variation on "As a (role), explain (thing) in (style)"
- 🚮 Blogspam: Anything the mods consider crypto/AI bro success porn sigma grindset blogspam
General Rules 📜
Members are expected to engage in on-topic discussions, and exhibit mature, respectful behavior. Those who fail to uphold these standards may find their posts or comments removed, with repeat offenders potentially facing a permanent ban.
While we appreciate focus, a little humor and off-topic banter, when tasteful and relevant, can also add flavor to our discussions.
Related Communities 🌐
General
- !Artificial@kbin.social
- !artificial_intel@lemmy.ml
- !singularity@lemmy.fmhy.ml
- !ai@kbin.social
- !ArtificialIntelligence@kbin.social
- !aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Chat
Image
Open Source
Please message @sisyphean@programming.dev if you would like us to add a community to this list.
Icon base by Lord Berandas under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I also think somehow AI is getting less useful. The tighter they reign in what it's allowed to say and do and the more it sounds like a corporate tool, the less fun it is to try bending it to new purposes. We can draw and edit pictures, and we can summarize information, and we can write extremely simple computer code.
You can also make passable porn and smut, but the efforts to not let it do those things cripple it for other purposes such as tabletop roleplaying. I wrote a discord bot for this purpose almost a year also and I've spent way more time fighting with the prompt to allow combat or relationships than I have writing code and it's tedious. It's free to use in my private discord with a few select friends and no one has done anything with it in months. And these friends are all AI enthusiasts who became friends through AI Dungeon.
As an unregulated wild west frontier, AI is great and inspires creativity. As a sanitized corporate propaganda machine, it's really quite dull. I'm hoping some less censored versions catch up to OAI, but for now it feels like the gold rush is dying because it turned out to be nothing but pyrite.
Tbf LLMs and image generators are a tiny part of the field.
AI is used all over the place but not normally out in the open.
That really depends on what you are calling AI. From my perspective, LLM, voice recognition and reproduction, and image generation, manipulation, and identification is the majority of AI. AGI doesn't exist outside of theory and primitive prototypes. If you want to include general programming using regex and case, that's not what I call AI.
Or are you saying the lion's share of AI is not on this list at all? Because I'd be interested to do more research on these other disciplines.
From my perspective, LLM, voice recognition and reproduction, and image generation, manipulation, and identification is the majority of AI.
I think that's a very short-sighted view of the subject. You're basically reducing AI to a very narrow set of specific, high-level practical applications of AI, leaving everything out of your personal definition.
The only thing I've deliberately left out is bog standard programming the likes of which I've done for 25 years. Which is why I asked what I'm missing.
They are pretty much all neural networks. But neural networks are not the extent of the field at all. And these aren't there only uses either.
Just the most well known.
The field dates back to the 60s with the percaptatron and is huge.
Probably a little of both, but I really don’t think there are very many practical applications for current AI technology.
I don't think that's true at all.
A couple of days ago I read a post about someone using ChatGPT to generate commit messages from the diff. That's pretty cool.
Chatbots are also surprisingly helpful. Today's technology is already good enough to put together working expert systems. I'd love to have something like a chatbot that was fed something like all the papers from one or more academic journals related to a specialized field, and be able to ask it open-ended questions.
I think that nowadays the limit for actually useful AI is the imagination of those who work on today's cutting edge AI. It would be cool to hear more about those.
You are being silly and gullible. These chatbots just make shit up. You can't learn anything from them. It's literally worse than just googling the question and believing whatever nonsense you read on Quora. They don't "know" anything, they're a particularly advanced form of your phone's predictive text feature.
These chatbots just make shit up.
As someone who interacts with "these chatbots", the "shit" that they "make up" is very useful to onboard onto topics and find paths forward. They are the closest there is to expert systems, and currently there is no alternative that comes close to the value they provide.
You can’t learn anything from them.
Those who can't learn in general also won't learn in specifics.
lmao
I’d say a reflection of the amount of contributors on Lemmy.
It's not just limited to this community, either. Lemmy across the board still feels pretty empty compared to the sheer number of users Reddit has, unfortunately.
I haven’t posted much to lemmy, but already from the title of this community, I would expect more negativity than average because ‘actually useful’ is relative and frankly, I cant be bothered to make my case. I guess I let my reddit experience, as somone there from it’s beginning when it started to take over digg, color my viewpoint of humanity on social networks.
I would expect more negativity than average because ‘actually useful’ is relative and frankly, I cant be bothered to make my case.
Perhaps it's just me, but the way I interpret the "actually useful" is that the goal is to showcase practical uses of some AI implementation showcasing how it's used to solve real world problems.
This is fundamentally different than all the "solution in search for a problem" announcements which ride the AI buzzword, which boil down to handwaving over their practical relevance.
neither, it's a reflection of the huge effort providing actually useful ai posts represents and the lack of any form of incentive. If every upvote donated a penny to their account from ours or was opt in ad sponsored to do so, then we would solve the issue.
it’s a reflection of the huge effort providing actually useful ai posts
Nonsense. All it takes is pasting a URL, or write a question similar to the one I posted.
No one is asking for a doctoral dissertation. All it takes is someone posting something like "hey look everyone I think this use of AI is pretty cool."