this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
45 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4105 readers
127 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tenebrisnox 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But there is currently no legal definition for vegan food, allowing firms to market their products as being so even if they contain dairy or egg.

This is quite alarming. It must mean that there is no regulation to ensure that vegan products are actually animal-free.

[–] seacocker@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm struggling to believe that can be true. I'm not a vegan but I'm sure it's be pretty upset if I were

[–] devnev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is no legal definition because even vegans don't fully agree on the definition, but there are branded certifications like "vegan society approved"

[–] mannycalavera 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I know it's daft but is there a legal definition of vegetarian food? If not then why would one exist for vegan?

[–] HipPriest@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Well really there should be one for both to avoid false marketing.

I don't know if there's one for vegetarian though

[–] tenebrisnox 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would imagine that people with severe lacto-intolerance would need it most. Actual vegans - for ethical reasons - will find this incredibly horrifying.

Saying all that, though, I remember listening to a programme on the radio about how there was no definition of (cows) milk. At that time there were 50 or so different liquids containing all sorts of ingriedients that called themselves cows milk.

[–] devnev 1 points 1 year ago

People with allergies will be looking out for allergen labelling. Veganism and vegetarianism aren't allergies and some people will have no issues with traces.

[–] HipPriest@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

That was the sentence that stood out to me the most as well. You'd think that would be essential

[–] devnev 2 points 1 year ago

Veganism isn't an allergy and shouldn't be used as an allergen indicator. From the article I can't tell if the products are also missing suitable allergen labelling, the vegan alternatives I use always seem to indicate traces of animal products in the labelling.