this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
385 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 116 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Oh yeah? Well he can go fuck himself. It's none of his business what married couples decide. Fuck him and his fascist religion. Edit: spelling

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you're a woman and vote to put any Republican in power in this country, no matter how small or local, you must be insane.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the conservative women I know, it's because they don't think these Draconian laws will ever apply to them...which is just characteristic of them.

They don't think abortion should be legal because they can control their own sexual activities. If women (i.e. slutty liberals) want to have sex then they should be ~~punished~~ blessed with a child.

Women conservatives are just conservatives. They don't think the law will apply to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...or hoping that backing/marrying a powerful man will mean the leopards won't eat YOUR face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I get your point, but let's not imply that it's only women's job to vote Republicans out. Policies detrimental to women diminish and damage the whole country and that's everyone's responsibility.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I don't think anyone was saying all the responsibility belongs to women. I think they were saying that women, among other targeted groups, should have extra motivation to vote these people out.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago (5 children)

He doesn't like divorce because he doesn't want to be single. His wife didn't even show up to his event.

Someone actually married this guy?

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait for real? His wife wasn't there?

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was 14 hours between his nomination and the speech. According to NPR , she couldn't get a flight. Dude is still an assclown.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I still run into men all the time that lament no fault divorce as being one of the worst things that ever happened in this country (along with Roe and women being able to have their own bank account/credit line, of course).

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Please refer them to this comment next time you run into them:

Y'all are some punk ass bitches. Grow up and stop being a weak-kneed, cowardly, controlling asshole. If you want someone to love you, then be worthy of their love.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't like divorce either until I understood why my parents got one.

[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 year ago

Yeah I didn't get it when I was a kid, but turns out my mom was a fucking lunatic so 👍

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Einstein was wrong. Time travel has to be possible. I came here expecting ppl to pile onto the guy. Instead, I get debates about divorce like it was 1855!

You Americans are a wild bunch, I tell ya.

And to the people about to comment that I should not inject myself into debates into U.S. politics as foreigner: I'll stop that the moment this community gets renamed to USpolitics.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

'Murican here. Given that our politics are absolutely fucked, I'd say keep the constructive foreign insight coming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kengaro0@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I only see one guy against divorce and they're heavily down voted.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is very on brand for republicans. It is part of the overall plan to create Gilead (that SHOULD be an exaggeration but... if anything it is an understatement). The idea being that women are property.

  1. Abortion is evil. Because if a guy knocks up a woman? Assuming he doesn't "deny deny deny" and his lawyer can't get him out of it, he is looking at a ridiculously small tax that he pays for a few months and then ignores for the rest of his life. A woman loses months (if not years) of her life to recovery and childcare and loses earning potential for her entire life. Which... makes her more beholden to her spouse.
  2. Affirmative action is racist/sexit/whatever. Because, same as above, it makes it easier for Manly Men to refuse to promote or hire women to keep them barefoot and pregnant because they can't get a job.
  3. Divorce is wrong: So even if your property gets uppety and thinks she can find a way to survive without you? Sorry, not legal, go cook dinner and then I'll put another baby in you.

And plenty of others. The goal is to make women property that can't escape or ever say no.

And the idea of a man wanting to leave a woman? Just kill the bitch and get a new wife. Or fuck your daughter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is it anytime one of these republicans opens their mouth I know they’re going to say something infuriatingly regressive, backwards, and going to try to fuck someone over with their view?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I think you just defined conservatism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The great thing about democracy is that you can have a personal opinion about a particular issue, and still defend the rights of people to act in opposition to your opinion, because those actions do not infringe on the rights of anyone else.

Unfortunately (yes, I am about to say it again), the House is controlled by the American Fascist Party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vaginal_blood_fart@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

America is fascinating. Just a giant church of hypocrisy with a tonne of guns

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago

The most powerful man in the House doesn't like ~~divorce~~ women

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah he’s a giant piece of shit. He better hope he doesn’t end up on https://gayhomophobe.com after getting caught with a rent boy. The louder someone hates and complains, the more they have to hide.

[–] Stanwich@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Just fucking end marriage. It's fucking archaic. When two people become partners they enter a business partnership . That's it. It should be treated as such.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›