Man you know your country is fucked when you can go to jail for weed no fuckin problem, but commit massive amounts of fraud? Nah you’re a free man and also a government representative.
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
316 points (99.1% liked)
politics
19072 readers
4220 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This won't go anywhere. Doesn't he have diplomatic immunity since he is the Crown Prince of Denmark?
He was actually the first black astronaut and also invented the light bulb. Give this man his due respect!
I'm tired of seeing this deuce with articles like "George Santos faces arrangement..." or "George Santos new legal problems..."
I want to see a headline like "George Santos faces new challenges with his cellmate Fat John"
Speak for yourself. I'm happy to see his case moving forward, and I don't want to hear about this fucker past when the judge says the word "guilty."
Not to be a downer but I'd like to help you brace yourself for the coming Santos reality show/hosting/podcast gigs (~5-10 years away of course.)
Sure, but he'll probably be on the same circuit as Alex Jones, and he'll be forgotten by all but the True Believers.
Not saying that, it's just so slow and I don't see him in jail yet
"The gears of justice grind slowly but finely."
I like the quote...
With that said, I guess the ones for Trump are the finest gears ever made
Broadly speaking, now that the prosecutors have the body of evidence and considering what they're trying to establish, they're moving relatively quickly for legal cases.
It's worth remembering, too, that except for the fraud case, a lot of his criminal conduct is novel. No president in the history of the US has done what he has done, so there's little to no past precedent that could help speed things up.
Knowing republicans, they will still vote for this fraud. At this point republicans exclusively vote for fraudsters and traitors.
And he is still in congress, voting
Huh, this guy might not be on the up and up.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. (AP) — U.S. Rep. George Santos is set to be arraigned Friday on a revised indictment accusing him of several frauds, including making tens of thousands of dollars in unauthorized charges on credit cards belonging to some of his campaign donors.
The New York Republican was scheduled to appear at a courthouse on Long Island to enter a plea to the new allegations.
He has already pleaded not guilty to other charges, first filed in May, accusing him of lying to Congress about his wealth, applying for and receiving unemployment benefits, even though he had a job, and using campaign contributions to pay for personal expenses like designer clothing.
He has denied any serious wrongdoing and blamed irregularities in his government regulatory filings on his former campaign treasurer, Nancy Marks, who he claims “went rogue.”
She told a judge when she recently pleaded guilty to a fraud conspiracy charge that she had helped Santos trick Republican party officials into supporting his run for office in 2022 through bogus Federal Election Committee filings that made him look richer than he really was, partly by listing an imaginary $500,000 loan that had supposedly come from his personal wealth.
During his successful 2022 run for office, Santos was buoyed by an uplifting life story that was later revealed to be rife with fabrications.
The original article contains 373 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 40%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!