this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
47 points (85.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35903 readers
1997 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This means no sales, no themed merchandise, no decorations. December 25 and most other day are treated just like any other day for all stores malls, restaurants, ect.

You'd still get non religious holiday events like mothers days, or independence days.

What whould change?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That would never happen. Those events are too profitable.

[–] Afghaniscran 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure you understand the words "what if"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's so weird when people refer to Christmas as religious holidays. Like, I know its Christianity origins, but Christians just stole it from pagans, gave it a different name and called it their own.

I live in an atheist country and everyone celebrates Christmas, just without all the religious bullshit.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What atheist country do you live in?

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Christmas at this point isn't even a religious holiday.

Do people worship Santa Claus? I mean, they do sort of worship the God Consumerism, to be fair.

However, the baby Jesus ain't got shit to do with the modern version of this holiday.

Just ask the fucking Saturnalia trees we break out every year. The holiday has absolutely loads of pagan traditions present in it because when Constantine shouted out "Hey all you Romans, all of you are Christian now!" didn't actually work very well. So they started mashing existing traditions onto the "new" tradition. So the Romans just took Saturnalia and slapped Christmas on it and was like "this totally tracks!" to get people to accept Christianity as the new religion of the Empire.

I mean, holy fuck, middle eastern winters are far too cold for a baby in a manger. Kid would have frozen the fuck to death.

Whole thing is a joke anyway from fucks who don't know shit about history because the only book they bothered to ever try to read (and they only really read what their preacher told em) was the Bible.

If they read (and believed) other books, they would and should be embarrassed.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Most of the people you're thinking about as a problem haven't read the Bible either. They'd think the stuff Jesus said was commie, bleeding-heart, socialist stuff (because it is)

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

To Christians, it very much is still a religious holiday and should be considered as such. As someone who thinks we should still do away with such holidays.

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A bunch of conservative Christians would be extremely mad

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Disagree. Christians hate the fact that Christmas is so commercialised. Although they would probably still be mad anyways.

Keyword here is conservative. They got mad when Starbucks stopped putting Christmas patterns on their cups.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Christmas isn't a religious holiday. Christmas today has basically nothing to do with the birth of Jesus, just like how Halloween isn't celebrating the Grim Reaper. It's just a fun and festive time.

[–] sizzler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I always considered it the mid-winter celebration. A time to break into some of the stored food (sugar-preserved fruit anyone?). Basically a way to raise the spirits since autumn harvest was long gone and it felt a long way til spring.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] figjam@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism forbids fewer reasons to buy things.

[–] Seigest@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It also forbids stagnation, it can built a bigger and better holiday

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

“Target Promotes Atheism To Children”

[–] TheInsane42@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They'd loose loads of sales. I wouldn't mind, as I don't 'celebrate' those days anyway, but economically it would be bad for loads of stores and every company that is making or other way involved in all that junk.

It's more about commerce then religion anyway.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So, they’d keep Mother’s Day? The one invented by consumerism? But abandon the other ones that drive even more sales? Does that include Thanksgiving/Black Friday?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanksgiving is about the only holiday I give a rats ass about. Ignore the fucked up history, ignore the bullshit stories about the Pilgrims.

I do two things on Thanksgiving. Find simple things to be thankful for in my life, and eat good food.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then life would be a little more boring. I'm agnostic, but I love the Christmas spirit and Halloween spirit. I could live without the rest of the holidays.

[–] Seigest@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We can have these without the commercialism can't we? Homemade decorations and costumes have more value and the act of making them with your family provides the time to talk about what these traditions are about.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oddly I don't do Christmas at home, aside from sharing a couple gifts. So its going about the city or to the mall where I tend to experience the decorations and festive atmosphere. As well as driving around and looking at people's light shows and lawn decorations.

Not sure how that would be impacted, but I would miss it if it wasn't there.

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't necessarily buy a lot of things when I go out during christmas time, but the lights and decorations just add to the "christmas spirit" for me.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you live in a place with snow?

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We'd get non religious holidays developing / being promoted to sell a bunch of shit. Some people classify halloween as a "religious holiday" because of its roots as All Saints Day eve, but it's pretty clearly a nonreligious "dress-up / horror" holiday nowadays.

If there was no Christmas there would be some generic winter cosiness holiday (as xmas/ December actually is for most Western countries). I live in France and there's loads of "Christmas" junk but it's 99% non religious. Even compared to the UK, where some people complain about "Christmas loosing its roots", it's noticeable to me how few of the decorations or cards have any religious imagery (even pretty neutral things like stars or angels). There loads of snow and winter animals, no wise men/shepherds, let alone 'baby jesus'. France is officially opposed to religious holidays because they're a "secular state" but they keep a winter and spring public holdiays that are at the same time as Christmas and around Easter. But other public days off are just other non religious events (national holidays like Bastille day, workers rights on may day, etc.)

And in seasons like summer that didn't have big religious holidays (or not popular ones anyway), there's loads of secular sources of themes / merchandising. The Olympics and World Cup (or whatever sports your country is into) always end up filling the supermarkets with loads of cheap junk and create a shared topic to "being people together".

Another French holiday is the midsummer "fête de musique" which was created by the government decades ago to replace the dangerous (notionally Christian but clearly pagan) "fête de Saint Jean" where people built big bonfires and young men tried to jump over them (leading to lots of injuries!). Now all cities and towns and even small villages will organise some concerts or live music evenings.

Tldr : if companies weren't promoting religious holidays, they'd just find other holidays to sell stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Huh. Well, the culture of the holidays wouldn't change in the rest of the populace, so the very first business to re-recognize and take advantage of holidays would make a lot more money than all their competitors over that period. Their competitors would all quickly follow suit, I imagine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Then they would start losing a lot of money. Christmas is one of the biggest events. People will find ways to celebrate it still though.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago

It would be easier for workers who are religious to take those days off; currently they're often "blackout" days with regards to time-off requests.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Chriatmas itself is great, its the obnoxious music and decorations that go up mid October that I hate

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 1 points 1 year ago

Obnoxious Music, agreed.

But the decorations are the best part. Cultural Event Decorations add to a feeling of a season. Sure some people put them up a bit early. But not everyone is into the spooky season. Despite their blatantly wrong opinion, they can decorate how they please... within reason.

What's obnoxious are people who go after you for not decorating or not decorating enough. People who tell you what to do in regards to decorations, are petty obnoxious little Karens.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What a boring life that would be. If the goal is to be more inclusive, how about the opposite direction and be more inclusive?

Still celebrate Halloween with costumes and candy and stuff but also Holi (I realize different theme) and Dia de Los Muertos. We really really need a holiday where we throw colored water balloons at each other (apologies if that offensive). How is that not global? But, for the love of God, not Carnevale, you haven’t seen what my co-workers look like

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Like what would happen if stores gave up possibly their most profitable period of the entire year? Christmas would go on via Etsy and eBay and such. It might slowly die as the years go on, but Christmas has a lot of momentum even if stores aren't selling the gear.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I would love to leave Christmas behind, but it is a huge percentage the stupid consumer-driven economy in the USA. I think it would upset the apple cart and put a lot of folks out of work for a while. I suppose things would stabilize and recover (unless riots and worse happened).

Christmas becoming a BFD was a gradual thing. It's one reason I don't care for Dickens. I don't blame him for all of it, but he certainly helped make it "mandatory fun" with his preachy novella. It's ironic, because he was moralizing against greed and now Christmas is all about greed.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lots of companies would see their stock price lower as Christmas is a major generator of sales, both with sales and themed goods.

[–] Seigest@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd call that the shock period. But imagine that would be temporary and less bad then we think.

Eventually I'd hope for less stores that only open for the holiday season and only hire for the rush. Things could just spread out more and we'd all be less dependent in revenue created from one event. We could focus our buying power on useful things and less cheap plastic crap bought to appease old rituals.

All very optimistic and unrealistic thoughts though

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] n0m4n@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Without the "on the seventh day, he rested" adage, I would not get days off. I had this pulled on me by religious bosses to force me to give up my only day off. They rejoiced when I found God.

I will never work for religious nuts again.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think the beauty of this line of social media is that it is so anonymous in the sense that it doesn't matter who is behind the username. It can be the most basic bitch in Ohio, a shut-in from Italy, a porn star from Hungary or a chart breaking pop star from London. As long they have something interesting to contribute, it does not matter at all who they are. No need to prove anything. Everybody can just be.

Edit: Oops, wrong post. But I'll leave it here, in the name of Eris!

[–] Seigest@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also the complete lack of context to why I'd ask the question. I could be a writer, this could be some nefarious data scheme, or im just dumb and curious. Doesn't really matter.

Really I'd just been watching somthing like Defunctland and hearing about cool ideas that failed because they where not profitable enough.

I wondered what if that happened to religion. What might that look like. How many people whould it take to stop giving a crap about Christmas for companies to just be like "yhea lets just not do that anymore". And without Christmas would the rate of those engaged in Christianity just fall slowly? Whould that be all it takes?

Probably not. But figured I'll get some alternative perspective.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, butts. I replied to the wrong post. The one I intended to respond asked if there were celebrities on the feediverse.

I must admit, it gave me great confusion to read your response in my inbox. And now amusement.

[–] Seigest@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

No worries. It was shocking relivent for a wrong post.

load more comments
view more: next ›