this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
67 points (98.6% liked)

United Kingdom

4108 readers
184 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GreatAlbatross 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely.
It's a great little nudge to companies.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Depends on how deep they check. If they approve greenwashing techniques like carbon offsets, not much will change.

[–] florge 27 points 1 year ago

Good, now if only he could do that with politicians too.

[–] mannycalavera 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unless they prove green credentials

Good. I don't see the issue here.

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They lost them automatically already.. they're simply not getting them back from the new king. I'm not sure why they're so shocked..

Any company that, as they claim, needs that approval to survive didn't have much of a product to start with.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

It's not so much that they won't survive, it's a Royal Warrant. That means a lot to some people/companies. Maybe not to you or me, but if, for example, Fortnum and Mason lost the warrant, sales would plummet.

[–] HumanPenguin 1 points 1 year ago

You are not wrong. But 70 years is a bloody long time for any company to survive. If it was not for the stability the Queens Warrant and the reputation and respect that gave them. It is very unlikely any company would have survived without huge change.

If these companies can somehow provide genuine green credentials. Good for them. The tradition andd tourism has some value. If not. This seems like one of the better moves the king can offer. Lets see what actually happens.

It def seems more like the King is trying to do a bit of marketing for his own reputation. Also given his history of supporting environmental causes. These companies really should have expected and been working for this a good few years back. At least the ones he has had any real connection to.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[–] Flax_vert 7 points 1 year ago

Great use of a great system!

[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

What about ‘greenwashing’ credentials?