this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
14 points (75.0% liked)

Germany

1592 readers
1 users here now

The place to talk/ask about stuff in Germany in English.

Wiki: https://lemmygermany.github.io/wiki/

Many thanks to @Vittelius@feddit.de for creating this!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ebikefolder@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago

...approves to keep them as a backup, just in case.

They were, on paper, completely decommissioned, and the permit to keep them as a reserve was extended for a few months. Since the gas supply is much safer this year, it is very unlikely that these coal plants will be fired up. But now it would be legal to do so.

[–] Luminocta@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Impressive. Not in a great way..

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Id rather see renewables, nuclear runs a close second but if its a choice between Australian coal or Russian gas...

[–] PhineaZ@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Under the old CDU government(s) 10 years ago, we decided to pivot away from nuclear. The plan then was to substitute with coal, then gas and long-term transition to wind. Gas was cut short in this equation and federal government is doing what they can to force renewables, but that is fairly hard to do over 4 years. Reintroducing nuclear short term is - pardon my french - horseshit. By the time the reactors would be planned and laws were (re)written accordingly we could already be CO2 neutral (or as close as we will get). Instead Europe should work together imo and reinforce the grid - spanish sun with scandinavian hydro, offshores in the Nord- and Ostsee as well as geothermal heating and we can stem this. Let there be a calm and dark day, it will not cover all of Europe. And seeing how many people now rant about especially the green party either being too slow or too fast on climate issues I have a stark fear that next term we will have Merz - a far-right conservative and in my humble opinion a damned populist.

[–] Luminocta@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does that clarify closing existing reactors?

[–] legofreak@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

The decision to close the remaining reactors was made around a decade ago. It's simply not possible to flip a switch and turn them back on. There's no fuel, the reactors have not been maintained and the personnel to run these reactors or perform the maintenance is not here any more. The fuel also has to come from somewhere, and " somewhere" being mostly Russia.