OSR/NSR Tabletop Roleplaying Games

@kensanata@lemm.eei the reason why on reddit I did not hang out "generic" rpg spaces is because by sheer volume DnD 5e players dominate the conversation, and a large part of the DnD 5e conversation (at least on reddit) seems to focus on mechanics optimization, meta, and very DnD-specific things I am not interested about.

OSR/NSR/Indie spaces are more interesting for someone like me that prefers talking about adventuring, and the less boardgame-y or MMO-y aspects of the game.

To clarify: I have zero elitism or gatekeeping feelings towards DnD 5e, it's a good game that opened up the hobby to many many people, and it's a blessing, however I like having a space where to talk about rpgs that are not it.

I think there's a "safe spaces" element as well. It's not just the system-- the system becomes a shorthand for a whole host of philosophies and genre conventions. Ideally, there'd be all sorts of communities at an atomic level and through federation (or something similar) we would join all the ones that interested us and crosspost things that extend over boundaries or confound the boundaries that we've drawn. That's some of the promise of a Lemmy (or Reddit) but the reality is when end up in walled off silos instead of interconnected gardens.

I generally agree. The problem is you probably never know in advance if a new group will have enough action to sustain itself or if it will die.

My assumption is that the primary reason for a split is that some group is invisible in add larger group because it is smaller. For example, in a general „rpg“ group it will be mostly about D&D 5e. Everything else is barely visible. So someone will try to create another group. Zero problems:

• How to split? There are multiple dimensions and „not D&D 5e“ is a stupid name. One could split by system, by genre, by publisher, or whatever. It is effectively a random choice.

• Due to the invisibility in the large group, nobody knows how many will follow into the splinter group. That is the risk.

I generally agree with you in that 1) I absolutely feel they have a lot of value as tags and 2) they shouldn't be used to put people in camps.

But otoh, it's human nature to group people together based on arbitrary tags. So I don't see how you can avoid the in-group/out-group behaviour while still keeping the terms around as tags.