this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

4122 readers
2 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I used this quite frequently but since Google """"improved"""" it last year (there was a popular HN post complaining about this) it doesn't work anymore. Search for a domain name with quotation marks for example just recombines the contents of the domain and returns a bunch of unrelated content completely cluttering what I am looking for. Until last year it used to return no search results if there weren't any exact matches, which is the whole point.

Does someone have a work around for this phenomenal Google decision?


There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Is that what happened?! I wondered why my quotes weren't working he other day.

[–] BluesF 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Partially related, but I've noticed Google slowly adopting more and more weird little "features" that change the functionality... often for the worse. The latest is the change to the little suggested "search types" for want of a better term - e.g. when you search for a product it comes up with "shopping" to switch to shopping. These now seem to be AI generated, and much worse than before... quite often I want to do a product search but the option doesn't appear, and instead I have a bizarre selection of options most of which just repeat the search with an extra word added. Weird and annoying.

[–] FuntyMcCraiger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Searching for jackets: ✅

Searching for long jackets: ❌

I'm so used to having the second option be images. So now I often click the products tab or whatever option it thought up and I know for a fact that Google is gonna take that one misguided click and run a whole ad campaign on it.

[–] variants@possumpat.io 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use ddg and I find it endlessly frustrating. Am I doing something wrong or is there a privacy/quality tradeoff?

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

There's definitely a quality trade off. DDG uses bing for search results (which, at one point they were letting bing keep tracking data on you so it's debatable if they're much better than google), and bing's results are definitely inferior to google's. I don't really notice a difference unless I'm trying to find hard to find info, but it's very obvious on searches for things like troubleshooting a problem.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Duckduckgo is probably even worse for this. For example, you can't filter words with by putting "-" before it. You can find years worth of forum posts begging for the feature.

I committed to using ddg for a few years, but after realizing that I was using bangs for anything but the most trivial searches, I had to be honest with myself and just give up on it.

Oh shit... After looking it up it's gotten worse since I quit: https://www.ghacks.net/2023/04/24/duckduckgo-disables-most-search-filters-from-search/

[–] variants@possumpat.io 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dang I did notice it was pretty flakey with the "-"

What's not Google and better than ddg?

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I wish I knew

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google is preparing to basically replace it's old search engine with their own AI based search. I happen to be a beta tester of their AI within GDocs and GMail, and honestly I'm not impressed.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm typically not impressed with anything that Google puts out nowadays.

I don't know what the people working there are doing. Probably just replacing burned-out components in server farms.

[–] miketunes_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Erm, why is it so extremely expensive? $60 a year and I get 300 searches a month? If you are researching something for a project you might use 300 searches in a couple of days.

It’s a cool concept, but they charge a fortune and their privacy statements are basically, just trust us bro.

[–] miketunes_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Basically search engines all cost money, but you paying with your personal data with Google vs dollars with Kagi. I've only been testing it a few weeks but I think it's worthwhile. Here's what they say about it: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/why-kagi/why-pay-for-search.html

[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I understand they cost money, but it really seems like an expensive service, I can understand high operating costs, but 1.5 cents a search is pretty high when you are searching stuff up like 25 times a day. It’s just so expensive when I can go with a non profit like ecosia and get a free search engine that also respects my privacy. And on top of that it plants trees. I imagine kagi has better results but I just can’t see it being worth it.

I know Reddit, Twitter, Meta, and a bunch of tech companies are having a rough time right now, but why is Google throwing their hat in the ring? Is making their services crappier becoming trendy? Or was it simply that AI couldn't parse the old search flags so they just removed it, hoping that AI would somehow become better in the future?