this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
809 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 264 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's a slow top-down, follow the chain of command, follow policy, follow the chain of custody, vote, protest, violently seize the means of production,

until we have universal healthcare.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 164 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I like that the thumbnail is John Fetterman. Like who else could this be almost explicitly aimed at.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Exactly. Now watch, some of the GOP that complained about Fetterman's clothing choice will take it to the extreme and wear a chicken costume or something.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I'm holding out for aborted fetus costume. I can feel it in my bones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViewSonik@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well there was a literal orange clown in the oval office for a few days so republicans were already dressing up

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope he goes wearing overalls with one shoulder unbuckled and nothing else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Poor guy got so depressed having to wear a suit they changed the dress code. I can empathize. My boss told me to put a dress shirt on if I'm on camera with customers and I hate it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 159 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok so can we have universal healthcare now? Cause that should be the biggest issue every single day for them.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Until the filibuster is gone or there are 60 dem senators, a vote on universal healthcare will just be performative. You're not going to get any Republicans voting for that.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then? Let it be performative. Make it the top issue every single day. Make sure nothing gets done until it gets done. Tie to budget, tie it to cabinet appointments, tie it feel good bills that do nothing. A single issue that shuts the government down until resolved. Eventually it will be. The DNC keeps playing nice and keeps failing.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Republicans: Democrats want to shut down the government??

No. Wait. Stop.

See, your problem is in thinking Republicans want a functioning government.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hold on, we gotta approve socks and sandals

[–] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then, tax breaks for the rich and mega corporations.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 1 year ago

And then we have to take a break, that was a lot of work.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 86 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The programming socks to legislating socks pipeline

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The average age of Congress is 182 years old

Um.. maybe not lol

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Age shaming in the femboy community smh

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 85 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Although senators will benefit from the change by being permitted to sport casual clothes in the Senate chamber, their staffs are still required to wear business clothes under the old dress code. People other than senators who walk on to the Senate floor will also need to wear business attire, which for men means a jacket and a tie.

One rule for thee but not for me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Dress codes are designed to keep the "wrong people" out. Show up to a DC event and they'll know you don't belong by the cut of your suit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (8 children)

should've passed it for every job, everywhere, using the same logic

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Indeed. What is considered "business attire" is exceedingly stupid and impractical.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But then how could we tell the poors from the real humans?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd love to see the moral scolds on the right pipe up about how scandalous this all is, right after Lauren "handy" Qbert was caught on video....

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fetterman has already addressed this on Twitter/X.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Know what would be funny? All the Dems show up in tan suits.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Everyone will live long enough to regret this. Matt Gates will show up in a thong and a gas mask to protest something and the votes won't be there to bring things back the old rules.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I’m ok with this- who the fuck cares if you have a tie.

I was all shit and tie when I started my job, and especially after Covid, things have relaxed to just about anything. Sure, I still put on a nice work polo for a client meeting or something, but fuck the suit and tie. If anything, fancy dress code made me way less productive because I was god damned uncomfortable all day. I’m a software engineer and cloud architect- wearing a dress shirt and tie is ridiculous.

As for our lawmakers, one less thing to distract them from actually reading bills and having productive discussion is a win.

[–] 0_0j@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m a software engineer and cloud architect

Knew it 🤣🤣

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have a friend who used to work for some big time government IT contractor, he was a tech guy, software engineer or something along those lines. One time they wanted him to go to some meeting, and not that he normally dresses like a slob or anything, but for the meeting he put on like a polo and khakis figuring he should look somewhat professional. They told him to go put a hoodie on because they thought whoever they were meeting with wouldn't take him seriously as a programmer if he looked too presentable.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I hope this goes to the House too so I can finally see Boebert in her wal mart pajama pants

[–] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey now leave comfortable clothes out of this

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've got a thing for trashy women dressed in Wal-Mart chic.

No hate intended.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] girltwink@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This is part of a slow trend towards powerful people dressing casually to differentiate themselves from the less powerful people who work for them. Historically, trends like this have been set by the elite and are then emulated by people trying to convince others that they are elite. This is the beginning of the end of formal wear in the United States. Soon a suit will mean "i work at a hotel".

[–] hibsen@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hence this part, perhaps?

Although senators will benefit from the change by being permitted to sport casual clothes in the Senate chamber, their staffs are still required to wear business clothes under the old dress code. People other than senators who walk on to the Senate floor will also need to wear business attire, which for men means a jacket and a tie.

Rules for thee, not for me.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fetterman wearing a hoodie is BAD AS FUCK.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

They should wear togas and sashes. Maybe have some fist fights and assasinations once in a while.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You heard the old man in charge, boys. Dicks out on Monday.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fuck yeah. Hoodie and jeans. He's the most "average man" there is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mandolingual@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eh, I'm fine with it being loosened up, but is it really "whatever they want"? If it is then I'd think annoying attention-grabbing messaging would become an issue. (Or, not an issue, in the grand scheme of things, but another in a long list of distractions)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoJoGAH@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This will be helpful in so many ways, humility and work ethic will be encouraged by not inflating ego with suits. If a suit is your style, great and fine, have at! If you are wearing it to feel important and you are working with others who are dressed differently, you are reminded that the job is at hand and not ego.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I saw a dude the other day looked exactly like Senator Fetterman. He was a tow truck driver.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That is the function and fucking power of democracy; it is not the flaw.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chili1553@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It looks like it’s geared towards men and their suits but does anyone know if there were changes for women? I know Canadian parliament women had to protest to not get in trouble for just showing their shoulders, not sure if there’s similar rules in American congress.

load more comments
view more: next ›