this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
1918 points (94.6% liked)

Memes

45585 readers
1425 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beteljuice@lemmy.ml 104 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We need both. Fucking hate binary thinking. It's a curse.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe, but one seems to get all the attention and little results.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Not saying I disagree but methinks many of you don't realize everything we use fossil fuels for from plastic to fertilizer it's not just gas. You think costs are spiralling out of control now.... oooh boy just wait.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Society would change, a lot. I’d be very interested in what a plastic-phobic society would look like. Remember milkmen, who would take one empty glass bottle and give you a full one?

[–] Bloodyhog@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As in, billions will die? That is a big change indeed...

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yeah it's scary that people don't seem to understand that this would lead to billions dead which would cause chaos and resources wars that totally doom the planet.

We need infrastructure to transition, we need technological innovations and cultural stability

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That's true, we need fossil fuels for so many things besides transportation. At the same time, we are simply running out of fossil fuels. Even if we ignore the impact on the environment completely, there will be a point in the not too distant future when there will simply be nothing left to pump.

So what I am wondering is, even if one thinks man made climate change is a hoax or something similar, shouldn't the first and foremost thing everyone agrees on be to still spare those scarce resources? For things we really ("really") need to make from oil?

The first thing that comes to mind (maybe since I work in the lab) is medical equipment. You don't really want to have to wash and reuse things like catheters, do you? I am not sure if bioplastics (i.e., still plastics, but made from plants) would be an alternative here once we run out but I sincerely hope so.

Prices will go up, in any case, and it will be a painful transistion. But now we are at a somewhat luxurious point where we can still make this transistion somewhat controlled and "smoothly". If we continue to treat oil as a never ending resource and then do a surprised pikachu face once there is nothing left this will be much much worse, won't they?

[–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We already know how to create plastics from CO2 extracted from the air and hydrogen from water. There is no shortage of raw material for plastics. The main question for the industry is cheap plastics and the answer to that has always been cheap oil and gas.

Using proven reserves and current consumption you get to 47 years and things run out. That's a "within my lifetime" number for many.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't say we should get rid of all plastics. Some of it is required for medical purposes and food safety.

I would love for governments to grow some balls and start fighting against climate change. But in the case that that doesn't happen (and it probably won't because money). I would rather take price increase and inconvenience in exchange for a planet that's still livable in 100 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Plant based plastics are a thing.

Really, the only way we are going to ween ourselves off fossil fuels successfully is if they are more expensive than the alternatives. I hear shit like that all the time (big example is meat alternatives). Simply removing the subsidies that fossil fuels do enjoy would go a long way toward making them less attractive.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Am I the only one who thinks this is funny? It's a joke people.

[–] ExplosiveLynx@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You mean c/memes isn't the place for serious political discussion?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google "How to Blow up a Pipeline" by Andreas Malm

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm PRETTY sure that's a "incognito mode and several kinds of privacy guarding software" kind of search better suited for a search engine that isn't also a US government contractor 😄

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To think we really let the company who made YouTube's Compression handle the next image format.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We didn't, they decided to force it onto us. JPEG-XL is technically superior, but they refused to implement it into Chromium to push their own garbage because they know most people use Chromium anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Molotovs are the preferred beverage of the revolution

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Honestly this would speed up the process of transitioning away from FF.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's not terrorism, it's 🌟🌍ecoterrorism🌎🌟

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] UniDestroyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At least y'all are being honest now. I was getting tired of being gaslit.

[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

That “gaslighting” was us asking nicely

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What did you think all of the talk about revolution involved? Radical change isn't normally achieved through peaceful measures

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

MLK wouldn't have been as successful if there wasn't Malcolm X.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Flinch@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

I did it, and so can you, Jack! biden-rember

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (22 children)

Spicy takes are the best takes though, op

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@local106.com 12 points 1 year ago

So we're acknowledging that it's mostly a coordination problem.

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The US already started by blowing up Nord Stream.

[–] QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Lol, Joe Biden, climate hero.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t call it a hot take

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

i guess explosive take fits better

load more comments
view more: next ›