this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
451 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19829 readers
5052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) repeatedly shouted an anti-trans slur despite objections from Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly.

She defended her remarks by attacking transgender rights and dismissing criticism.

The outburst drew condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates and political figures, highlighting her shift from previously supporting LGBTQ+ rights to embracing anti-trans rhetoric.

Mace has used the slur in past statements and introduced legislation restricting transgender rights.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

We need to speak more regularly about how these people obviously have kompromat on them and are being actively blackmailed - no sympathy as they are garbage humans regardless, but these changes in stance are so swift and violent. These people often have a history of not caring or even supporting these issues, before they become over the top, performative hate mouthpieces - it's so obvious that they were basically told by Republican operatives at some point, "you're gonna do what we say or we are going to fucking end your pleasant life". Again, no sympathy there because the underlying subtext is that these people do shit horrible enough that they can be blackmailed with it. But this is Mace as recently as 2023:

"I'm pro-transgender rights," she told CBS News' The Takeout in May 2023. "I'm pro-LGBTQ." The Republican lawmaker made the comments while saying she opposed gender-affirming care for minors. "Sex change surgery, the hormone blockers that sterilize our children, we shouldn't be doing that," Mace said. "Now, if they want to take on a different pronoun or a different gender identity, or grow their hair out, or wear a dress, or wear pants, or do those things as a minor, those are all things that I think most people would support. Be who you want to be, but don't make those permanent changes when it's a child," she added.

Not a perfect position by any means, but centuries away from what she is today.

And here is after she was first elected in '21:

She was one of the only Republicans to sponsor the Serving Our LGBTQ Veterans Act in 2021, which proposed establishing a Center for LGBTQ Veterans within the Department of Veterans Affairs. That same year, she even called for “transgender equality” while asserting herself as a pro-LGBTQ+ rights lawmaker. “I strongly support LGBTQ rights and equality,” Mace told the Washington Examiner. “No one should be discriminated against.” “It isn’t a black-and-white issue,” Mace added. “I do believe that religious liberty, the First Amendment, gay rights, and transgender equality can all coexist. I’m also a constitutionalist, and we have to ensure anti-discrimination laws don’t violate First Amendment rights or religious freedom.”

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Someone deserves to be maced, that much is certain. May you go to hell, Mace.

[–] DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world 25 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Against rando MAGAts, sure, but against the government? It's going to take more than commercial-grade weaponry to take on the military.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

The US government has lost all wars against gorilla warfare since i have been alive. And that is with an untouchable economy, uninterrupted logistics, and numbers.

None of that would be a thing in a revolt of the US. US Civilian weaponry is some of the finest in the world. And a 22. Will kill a man just as dead as a .50 BMG

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

I'd like you to be right, but I have my doubts. Maybe we'll find out.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

What a cissy.

[–] sparkyjones@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

This seems a bit obsessive and more than a little unhinged. I had the unique experience of being interviewed in a state committee and the experience can be overwhelming. The idea that someone would act up this way feels performative, dramatic, and to repeat the word, obsessed.

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

That's rich, coming from a sandwich-maker that left the kitchen.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

These people are supposed to be representing their constituents; it isn't supposed to be an episode of Jerry Springer. I'm surprised they aren't literally throwing chairs.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I actually read the article and clicked on the link to the hearing back and forth and can't find what the anti trans slur was. Honestly I can't think of what an anti trans slur would be so I guess its possible I somehow missed it but I assumed it would be obvious.

[–] tinned_tomatoes 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Saying "tranny" is a slur.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 6 hours ago

ok yeah. I would have picked up on that I think. I did not see it. I mean I get they don't want to say the slur but having to rely on someones basically opinion on what is what is sorta difficult nowadays.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

T**nny today

F**got tomorrow

N****r next week

This is escalation to test the waters

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Toonny

Forgot

Nibbler

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 42 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

They are not testing the waters, there isn't a plan. They are just bigots doing hateful things

You are right in that there may be escalation because sooner than later these assholes will realize Trans people are so few as to be invisible to them, they'll once again see their own lives are pitiful and move onto hate someone else just to feel good about themselves for a hot minute

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They are not testing the waters, there isn't a plan.

This is the plan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Where does it say they'll strategically start saying certain slurs in public in there?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

As these next 4 years go by do yourself a favor.

Write down right now what you expect and hope will happen from the current administration.

Now that you have your expectations and convictions on paper, don't move the bar when your leaders fail to meet your expectations and convictions. What you wrote down is what you beleive.

Stop moving the bar to always accept them, it isn't healthy.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yes, there is a plan. No, her screeching slurs isn't part of it, although it comes from the same hate and cruelty that the plan does.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago) (1 children)

It's also unhealthy for you to just block out ideas that make you uncomfortable, like having principles instead of following a strong man that makes you feel safe and changing your convictions when they no longer align with the strong man you cling to.

Stop moving the bar, you're lying to yourself.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Just because someone is a bigot doesn't mean they aren't following a plan. Testing the waters and normalizing bigoted thinking are things bigots do on purpose.

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

God this bitch is so desperate to cling to her 15 minutes of fame.

load more comments
view more: next ›