The article keeps hammering the point about how drug production is harmful to all parties involved in the production chain, hence should be eradicated for that reason. It makes absolutely no mention of the obvious point that these harms only happen because the process is illegal, and legitimising the entire process, like what's been done to cannabis in some places, might be an alternative option.
Excellent Reads
Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.
Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.
Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.
Rules:
- Common Sense. Civility, etc.
- Server rules.
- Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.
The world also has a massive licit drug problem.
People with chronic conditions need lifestyle and diet interventions, they should not be seen as forever customers of the pharmacology companies. That is a perverse incentive to make doctors treat symptoms and not cure patients. A cured patient doesn't have recurring revenue
That's not true for every chronic condition though. Lifestyle and diet can only do so much when your body just isn't doing what it's supposed to.
I'm not trying to defend pharma companies, but it's the state of science today that some things can only be treated and handled with ongoing medication