this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
281 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19693 readers
4206 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Congressional Democrats were blocked from entering USAID headquarters as they protested its planned shutdown by Trump and Elon Musk.

Lawmakers called the move illegal and harmful to national security, emphasizing USAID’s role in humanitarian aid, counterterrorism, and disease prevention.

Sen. Brian Schatz vowed to delay all State Department nominations until the issue is resolved.

The confrontation marks a growing standoff between Democrats and the Trump administration as they resist efforts to dismantle federal agencies.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They were blocked from entering, by who. NAME AND SHAME journalists, do your fucking duty. Who exactly is carrying out these orders. Who exactly has been escorting officials out of their offices. Names, badge numbers, pictures. This is history in the fucking making and the news media is just sitting and watching it play out like it's a fucking movie

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

The MSM is complicit. They're all owned by the same oligarchs who've ushered in the fascist dictatorship, and already bent the knee to it.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 79 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is going to happen to more agencies in the US government, and at least one of them is going to turn out to be load-bearing and cause the entire federal government to actually literally, and not in an exaggerated superlative way, cease to function.

And I don't mean in the way you could say "but it already has". I mean: one morning we're going to wake up and the Internet will be offline, the electrical grid will be browning out, and financial systems will be unable to process payments across the entire country, because the control systems have nobody at the helm and no one will have the credential access to perform maintenance upkeep.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago

Then after having burned down the house, Turnip and the magas will step in with authoritarian control and tell everyone that they have to save the country.

It's the same format that happened in Nazi Germany ... they literally destroyed and disrupted the nation in order to take control of it when it was on its knees .... after they had been the ones that took a baseball bat to the nation's shins.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like thats the day I will become the proclaimers, and walk 500 miles, and then 500 more just to be the man who walked 1000 miles to show up at canada/Mexico's door and begging for asylum.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there are going to be places within the united states that are somewhat less at risk from fascist incursion, such as the pacific northwest/cascadian area, a good bit of california, and especially new england. if you can get to those spots for a while, you might be able to collect yourself and contact the neighboring country either to the north or south and actually coordinate your passage instead of just trying to walk across the border unannounced. I don't think they're going to take too kindly to unauthorized refugees flooding in

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

The Pacific Northwest is only liberal in the cities. Eastern Oregon and Washington are scary conservative.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yep. This is just a trial run on one agency. Expect more.

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The most dangerous thing would be to destroy the FEC, CFTC, FDIC, GSA, NSF, SEC, SSA, SBA and NARA.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago

I can't even tell if these are real.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

There are very rich people who will not stomach that much disruption of the economy.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

For themselves. They only care about what will impact themselves. If the power grid got cut in the poorer parts of town, but their own power stayed on, most rich people wouldn't give a damn. Just like with lead water pipes, or budget-starved public schools, or the myriad of other issues that impact millions of non-rich people, they will let this shit happen for as long as they're not affected by it. No benevolent rich people are going to come out of the woodwork to save us.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn’t implying that, just that they won’t let things get too bad because it’s gonna affect their bottom line. People can’t keep scrolling Facebook if they don’t have electricity.

No, I see a far grimmer future of things barely working and them maintaining control.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Learn about Venezuela.

They literally fucked up their own electricity and caused a widespread self inflicted famine. None of their rich stopped this process.

Under Venezuela it was a bunch of authoritarian socialists. Actually, it's closer to socialism under Trump now that he's talking sovereign wealth funds and buyouts of his closest billionaire buddies.

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Elon wants to destroy the National Park Service, then seize his assets until he retracts his decision.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wouldn't they need the Treasury systems to do that? The Treasury systems he is now in control of? (Granted, I'm not sure how asset freezes/seizures work at that level).