this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
1609 points (98.3% liked)

Fediverse

29502 readers
3109 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

In my case I deleted instagram, instead of whatsapp I'm going to Matrix (I'll see who I get there), I changed Reddit for Lemmy and I'm trying to find an active Peertube instance that allows for account creation, live, and uploading videos

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Matombo@feddit.org 99 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Signal is not Fediverse! Element/Matrix is!

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 42 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Element/matrix aren't part of the fediverse, either. It doesn't speak AP.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Matrix is federated, Signal is not.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 107 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

For the avid readers out there, bookwyrm is a fantastic alternative to goodreads.

https://joinbookwyrm.com/

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] trecartin@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

Woo! Made one of first steps of switching today!

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 12 points 20 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 20 hours ago (11 children)

Hidden inside the whatsapp->signal box in tiny faint font. I was wondering why there isn't a big "Discord -> Matrix"

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 165 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (40 children)

Signal isn't federated ^[1][2][3.1]^; it's decentralized ^[1][2][3.2]^. Though, for all practical purposes, I would generally argue that it's centralized.

References

  1. Signal-Server. signalapp. Github. Published: 2025-01-31T15:34:14.000Z. Accessed: 2025-02-01T09:24Z. https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server.
    • This is the source code for the server that Signal uses.
  2. "Signal (software)". Wikipedia. Published: 2025-01-06T09:34Z. Accessed: 2025-02-1T09:30Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_(software).
    • ¶"Architecture". ¶"Servers".

      Signal relies on centralized servers that are maintained by Signal Messenger. In addition to routing Signal's messages, the servers also facilitate the discovery of contacts who are also registered Signal users and the automatic exchange of users' public keys. […]

  3. "Reflections: The ecosystem is moving". moxie0. Signal Blog. Published: 2016-05-10. Accessed: 2025-02-01T09:40Z. https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/.
    1. ¶5. to ¶"Stuck in time". ¶3-6

      One of the controversial things we did with Signal early on was to build it as an unfederated service. Nothing about any of the protocols we’ve developed requires centralization; it’s entirely possible to build a federated Signal Protocol-based messenger, but I no longer believe that it is possible to build a competitive federated messenger at all. […] [interoperable protocols] [have] taken us pretty far, but it’s undeniable that once you federate your protocol, it becomes very difficult to make changes. And right now, at the application level, things that stand still don’t fare very well in a world where the ecosystem is moving. […] Early on, I thought we’d federate Signal once its velocity had subsided. Now I realize that things will probably never slow down, and if anything the velocity of the entire landscape seems to be steadily increasing.

    2. ¶"Stuck in time". "Federation and control". ¶6.

      An open source infrastructure for a centralized network now provides almost the same level of control as federated protocols, without giving up the ability to adapt. If a centralized provider with an open source infrastructure ever makes horrible changes, those that disagree have the software they need to run their own alternative instead. It may not be as beautiful as federation, but at this point it seems that it will have to do.

load more comments (40 replies)

A federated social fitness app(like Strava) would be cool

[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not really all that invested in trying out Friendica, because Facebook is basically the exact sort of social network service that I really don't give a darn about. I wanted to check it anyway, but the only tangible information on what Friendica is about is the project/marketing page. I can't browse the instances. If I go to your massive social platform, the last thing I want to see is just a brick wall of a login page. Then I looked at fedidb and... um, those aren't huge user numbers.

So I guess I'll keep posting on the services that seem more sensible to me, like Mastodon, Pixelfed and Lemmy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Unpopular Opinion Lemmy and PeerTube logo look ugly.

[–] Padit@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago

Unpopular opinion: your opinion is not unpopular at all.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Nanowith@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nice to see the rear of them, was tough making the call to disconnect from a bunch of people, but I've told them where to find me. Hopefully it snowballs!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›