this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

18325 readers
982 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What is the use case for 0.0.0.0

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 hours ago

Just in case you want to do nothing, nowhere in particular.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't even realize 0.0.0.0 was a valid address to enter into a browser! TIL.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

On Linux it is just a catch all address (listen on all interfaces)

Elsewhere it doesn't do anything since I don't believe it is part of the networking standards

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 hours ago

Yeah I'm familiar with that part, I just meant in context of a browser being able to connect to it.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I just wish they'd stop blocking http requests on lan addresses honestly.

[–] KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 hours ago

Pretty sure you have an addon doing that, because Firefox doesn't.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 hours ago

Firefox doesn't block http at all

[–] EpicMuch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

Could you share a link for me to read up more on this?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Fine by me. I self-host a lot of stuff but never used 0.0.0.0 for browsing, so I just disabled it here to try it out.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com -4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

seriously. I like the federation but people way overuse the spoiler tag or nsfw or whatever. I usually skip over but had to vent. Oh uh. ankle in this one. better make sure no one gets fired over it.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 hour ago

wrong post?

[–] reattach@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Did you mean to comment on this post? It's not showing as NSFW to me

[–] Squiddlioni@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 4 hours ago

It shows an 18+ tag for me too, and the image is blurred. I assume it's because of our host software. I'm on kbin.melroy.org (Mbin), and the original commenter is on moist.catsweat.com (also Mbin).