this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6257 readers
75 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Look at all he can get done with executive orders. Remember when we were asking Biden to do the same? Oh well, not like our sham supreme court would let that stand.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 1 week ago

I mean Biden did pass an executive order to enforce Title IX to protect trans people the same way in accord with SCOTUS's June 2020 Bostock decision

[–] ech@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

With a respectable government, EOs are toothless when the next administration can just reverse it, as seen on 1/20/24. When elections are being done away with, though, they can be quite impactful.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope a bunch of trans service members challenge this in court, because it’s arguable that an executive order can’t retroactively change military policy that allowed trans service people to serve openly under their correct gender identities.

[–] Cybrpwca@beehaw.org 21 points 1 week ago

I think eight service members already have. I hope they add more.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 week ago

adoption of a ~~gender identity~~ political policy inconsistent with an individual’s ~~sex~~ stated purpose conflicts with a ~~soldier’s~~ politician's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life.