this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
143 points (100.0% liked)

news

23720 readers
990 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Republican House member introduced a resolution to amend the U.S. Constitution to allow President Donald Trump — and any other future president — to be elected to serve a third term.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GVAGUY3@hexbear.net 36 points 8 hours ago

″No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms,” the amendment states.

They are trying to make sure Obama can't run again

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 hours ago

The ACLU is going to fight this hard. Until it passes, then they'll support it 100%.

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 47 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The process to amend the US constitution is so convoluted it will never happen again.

[–] BabyTurtles@hexbear.net 11 points 8 hours ago

Not in time for Trump to have a 3rd term anyway, if Trump even lives that long.

He's just showing off how eager he is to get on his knees and lick the boots of the administration before they even asked him too. He needs Trump to know what a good boy he is.

[–] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 27 points 10 hours ago

Hell yeah let's undo the FDR term limit bill and get more people like him elected.

[–] Hohsia@hexbear.net 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It would be extremely funny if most of the dems voted no but republicans find a way to push it through anyway vote

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 hours ago

Are you serious? The Dems will absolutely vote yes for this

[–] Firstnamebunchofnumbers@hexbear.net 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Shouldve done thia earlier so we coulda voted in jimmy carter

[–] crime@hexbear.net 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Carter only did one term, we coulda been voting for him this whole time

Open casket presidency

[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 6 points 5 hours ago

Does it say anywhere in the Constitution that he still has to be alive to get elected?

vote Carter 2028

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 38 points 12 hours ago

Wow, this is unprecedented! Time for bipartisanship to take action!

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 34 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They're doing it for the wrong reasons, but I'd be happy if that limit wasn't there. It's fundamentally anti-democratic. Not that the us is a democracy and removing it now will just make fascist consolidation of power so much easier, but still

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, keeping a limit forces the MIC and other entrenched powers trying to push the US agenda around the world to stay in the bureaucratic shadows instead of gaining decades in the presidency outright.

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 1 points 4 hours ago

Not that the us is a democracy and removing it now will just make fascist consolidation of power so much easier, but still

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 30 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The current one is different so that unlike that one which would allow Bush or Obama to run again, it would forbid anyone with 2 consecutive terms from a third:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/29

[–] FolknForage@lemm.ee 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t have guessed it was a Democratic sponsor.

Why?? This was even before Obama’s 2nd term. Just because they thought they had the numbers?

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 2 points 6 hours ago

Honestly, I can't remember the reasoning. I'm sure there's a daily Kos article about it or something from back then. I do remember them claiming it wouldn't apply to Bush, but those of us in left leaning spaces were pretty suspicious.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 36 points 13 hours ago

Would he even be alive by a third term?

[–] crime@hexbear.net 28 points 13 hours ago

That was fast

[–] buh@hexbear.net 54 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Gosplan14_the_Third@hexbear.net 55 points 13 hours ago (7 children)

Bush will win the democratic party nomination in 2028 and he'll run against Trump.

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 19 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I'll note that you didn't specify which Bush jeb

[–] D61@hexbear.net 4 points 7 hours ago

I mean, the youngest Bush brother hasn't been activated yet...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PurrLure@hexbear.net 20 points 11 hours ago

IT'S TIME TO STOP blob-stop

[–] Civility@hexbear.net 4 points 8 hours ago
[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 31 points 13 hours ago

Please don't speak this into existence lol

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 12 hours ago

OMG. I feel it in my bones

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 7 points 10 hours ago

Please step away from the :lathe-of-heaven:

[–] MaxOS@hexbear.net 6 points 9 hours ago

Too real to be a bit

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 56 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Eh the term limits were out there in the first place by Republicans terrified of FDR. Trump probably isn’t going to take it and even if he did I could see the Dems pushing Obama, something Obama’s ego would be more than happy to take on.

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 4 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, they thought of that, and made sure this proposal would forbid 2 consecutive terms from having a third, just so it wouldn't apply to Obama

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 53 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

We're going to get Obama's third term with Kamala as VP, aren't we?

[–] jack@hexbear.net 12 points 10 hours ago

The last thing he wants is to have to do shit

[–] Saeculum@hexbear.net 12 points 10 hours ago

It's his turn (again)

load more comments
view more: next ›