this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4198 readers
229 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They should have captured the ship.

Russia is using the UK for extreme forms of propaganda. If you'd compare it to America, imagine if CNN is giving weekly visual and tactical examples of how America would destroy Russia when "the time is there".

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

If only we invested more in the military.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't make sense of this article. So did the ship actually enter UK waters, or was it just close to entering them and it spooked us?

So far, the ship has complied with international rules of navigation

All I'm getting from this is "a Russian ship sailed in international waters but near to the UK, and we think they're doing something sinister but they didn't break any rules so we can't do shit"

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Basically it followed international law but entered our exclusive economic zone which isn’t owned by the country but means we have the rights to the resources in that area or zone. Usually an exclusive zone economic zone extends 200 nautical miles from the country’s land. Mostly if a hostile military ship enters an area of interest they’ll be monitored closely.

[–] bacon_saber@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago

Huh? Certainly he was already aware there was one there

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

Healey added: "I also wanted President [Vladimir] Putin to hear this message: we see you, we know what you're doing and we will not shy away from robust action to protect this country."

Powerful warning 👊🏽, clown world.

[–] tenebrisnox -2 points 1 week ago

Non story for sabre-rattling attempt.

Navy rear-admiral on LBC this morning said that Russian subs go up the Channel daily to noin their Northern fleet and that if the UK scrambled a response every time it would exhaust the country’s resources. He said that Russian vessels are legally allowed in the area as long as they don’t interfere with any UK underwater resources.

Distraction from the Harry vs The Sun story and calls for criminal prosecutions?