this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
586 points (98.3% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

826 readers
855 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Aaarrrr, looks like I'll setup something for music too and dump Spotify. Once that's done, I'll happily make monthly payments to some service (or charity?) that sends money directly to artists

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

I just use Spotify with a hacked API. I like costing them money.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

If you're on android search for xManager. It can install... special APKs that are more pleasant for us cheapskate to use.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

If you're on android search for xManager. It can install... special APKs that are more pleasant for us cheapskate to use.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago
[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

If you're on android search for xManager. It can install... special APKs that are more pleasant for us cheapskate to use.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Buy shit from the Artists on Band camp. I have no affiliations other than 1000s of albums

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 104 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can be a second rate businessman and end up a millionaire.

You can be a third rate politician and end up as President.

You can be the greatest musician who ever lived and end up dead in the gutter.

Carl Hiaasen

[–] ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

27 Club rules say you pretty much have to end up dead in the gutter if you're the world's greatest musician.

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 70 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No fucking shit Sherlock. He's a founder of a multi-billion dollar company that has achieved close to a global monopoly for music streaming.

The only reason he's not american Scrooge McDuck level of rich is because he still pays Swedish luxury taxes.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to Forbes he has about seven billion dollars. That is definitely Scrooge McDuck rich. Turns out people can pay more in taxes and still be disgustingly wealthy.

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I compare that to the wealth of American billionaires whose singular worth soon breaks into trillions...

[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Honestly, I'm kinda sick of the artists payouts argument. The music industry is incredibly saturated. Like more saturated than anything else we consume daily by far. Having a few million streams sounds really impressive until you realize that the top 1,000 streamed artists all have more than 2 billion streams, and you've probably only even heard of a quarter of them. Some generic singer songwriter dude I went to high school with has a couple million streams, but in the broad scope he's absolutely nobody compared to the big dogs.

It's a competitive field. Physical albums can still sell to collectors, but not like they used to. So if you want to make a living as a band, you have to get creative and find other ways to profit. My personal favorite band realized touring is where they get paid the most, so they do well over 100 gigs a year, all over the world, and they've been doing it for 30 years.

The biggest reason I use Spotify personally is for music discovery. I've discovered countless bands because their algorithm is great and knows what I like. The amount of money I've spent on concert tickets, t-shirts, beers at venues etc all because I heard your song a couple times thanks to an algorithm is lost on folks making the streaming payout argument. If your music is good, it will get me to come see you live. If your live show is good, I'll come back and bring a friend.

Recorded music in my opinion should be an entry point, your argument for why I should come see you instead of the literal 9.8 million other artists on Spotify. Again, it's a competitive ass field. Not to be confused with a 'competitive ass' field which sounds fun.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

I don't think anyone misses that. That's all pretty obvious stuff. The issues are one step further. Why should this Spotify CEO be making that much off of the backs of the actual content creators? That's the rub. Why is that money going there, to someone who is completely invisible to the people paying the money, rather than to the people making the content they create? Or the people making the platform they use (Spotify devs)? This is ALWAYS the problem when people say X CEO made so much compared to Y service worker.

All this broadening what you have to do to attract a fan base is diluting the point of the art. I listen to music because I like the music. The artists should get compensated for their music. Encouraging them to do other things to make their money dilutes their time and effort. That is to say, if someone's talent is making music, let's give them money for that, not for striking a contract with some merch vendors or whatever other hoops we want them to jump through for their food.

[–] jg1i@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

The biggest reason I use Spotify personally is for music discovery.

YES! This is the single biggest reason to use any streaming service. DISCOVERY! I've been heavily using Jellyfin and Navidrome for media recently. Acquiring media is easy (especially if you speak English), managing media has never been easier.

But the reason I can't convince my wife to drop her subscriptions is due to discovery. And I get it. I feel it too. I have to put in extra effort. What do I download? IDK. I have to spend time to research now without Spotify and then commit to downloading, adding, managing the media. On Spotify/Netflix, etc I don't have to think.

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 9 points 21 hours ago

So… paid in exposure?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It’s almost as if musicians expect they will become rich from streaming… the real money is absolutely in touring and merch sales… like bfd you got streamed
2M times; what does YouTube give for 2M views? Even if it’s 1¢ per stream, that’s only a 20K payout which is a nice payout, but only really half of a single person’s salary for a year. Imagine having to split that 4 ways with bandmates.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my personal opinion which everyone will probably hate, any athlete or musician or actor ("entertainment" celebrity) is way overpaid once they hit the top 1%. There is absolutely no way any of them should be billionaires (e.g. Taylor Swift), and probably not even make more than a few million in their lifetime.

On the other hand no CEO should either. Everyone is replaceable, no one should be earning that amount of money. They didn't earn the place from talent and hard work, that someone else didn't put in just as much or be just as talented. They were simply lucky.

Don't even get me started on influencers.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Would anybody pay $200+ to see U2?

sigh apparently...

A bunch of my friends were stoked for the warped tour revival crap and I'm over here like "some of those bands haven't practiced in five years... Go see someone currently good."

It ain't like there's a shortage, but hype and name recognition is all some people care about.

"yeah, they sucked"

Wouldn't they....?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I literally can't get my wife to consider the idea of going to see a band we dont know. Theres apparently a lot of social expectation to going to shows.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno, man. I just like music.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I was just adding why some might look for those popular names when going to concerts.

They are all far too expensive, so we just dont go to any shows! Anyone have a spare 1000$ so two people near a major city can see a show this year?

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

"It's not who you're seeing, it's who you're seen with."

I loathe those kinds of people.

They have as much substance as gear oil. Gotta find a celebrity to appear relevant!

Ugh.

[–] Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This argument makes me so mad because you obviously have zero idea how any of it works. The only thing you had right was that it's a competitive and saturated market.

Artists didnt "figure out" touring pays the bills. That is the only way a performing artist can pay the bills. Artists who you would think "oh they made it, and are now setup for life" is just not true. The only ones that are like that are mega ultra pop/rock stars.

I can go on for days but honestly I don't have the bandwidth. Merry Christmas and happy holidays my guy.

[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

To be fair, I worked in the music industry for over a decade booking and promoting shows. I've also worked for two different festivals as well as 5 years managing a radio station, so I have some idea how this all works. It being oversaturated is the point. Just the top 50 artists on Spotify have received over 3,000,000,000,000 streams combined.

I'd love for every talented musician to be able to make a living doing what they love, but people are sheep and will listen to what they're sold and in a crowded space I don't see how that's tenable. When someone comes up with a better system, I'll be on board, but until then I'm gonna keep supporting the bands I love by seeing them live, telling my friends, buying their t-shirts, and encouraging them.

Hope you had a good Christmas too man, cheers

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And you now even less... do you think the music producers just handed out money to struggling artists back in the day? What do you think is so much worse for artists today?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's like saying visual artists shouldnt make enough money off their prints because people should go to a gallery to buy the originals as their primary income. So they're supposed to not profit off their work, take time off their other job to travel all over just so they can FINALLY maybe make money?

That's unreasonable to ask of musicians and artists.

You can use Spotify without needing to justify it to yourself. It's okay. You can hate what they do and still use their product because it works for you. I bought something off Amazon the other day because I couldnt find it in the store. We all do it. It doesn't absolve those companies of shitty behavior though.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

We dont all do it. The whole crux of it all is people knowingly giving business to people and companies that are doing immoral things.

"We all do it" is a bullshit excuse and you should know that.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

I promise you there's a line you hold to, but nudge across from time to time when it's clearly the best choice for you. We do, quite literally, all do it.

Make the effort to recognize it, do it consciously, and look for alternatives when you can. Extend the empathy and humility to those also trying their best. The world we've crafted has a way of forcing you to bend your principles and ideals.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm fresh back from a difficult Xmas with the Republican family, now checking Lemmy to relax, and gotta say your simply sane perspective is my biggest smile of the day. Appreciated.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dude, whatever, but this rent seeking asshole certainly does not deserve this money more than the artists.

But also, I don't care if music is saturated. People can have very niche music tastes. We don't need to all listed to billboard music. I mostly prefer indie stuff and would like they to earn a fair share of my subscription.

I also don't go to any concerts or festivals. It's just not a way I'm interested in listening to music. And I don't need to buy more crap so not gonna buy merch from the hundreds of artists in my favourites.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago

sure but why should the CEO and shareholders keep so much of the generated wealth?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Probably a good time to mention that you can unsub from Spotify, use it through the Brave browser, and you won't get any ads.

:)

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hmm Spotify didn’t like the play on the name of their year-end feature (Spotify Wrapped), I’m guessing?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The solution is to run your music streaming yourself -> https://www.navidrome.org/

One click install for those running Proxmox OS ->

https://community-scripts.github.io/ProxmoxVE/scripts?id=navidrome

The site you expose has no abilities to write or destroy any data, only read the music data from a harddrive so this is generally very safe to run from as far a cybersecurity perspective (but some general knowledge about port forward risks is recommended)

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

I just have a (decentralized) synchronized music folder on all my devices (encoded with OPUS currently).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 25 points 2 days ago

Someone let our Italian friend out of prison.

load more comments
view more: next ›