this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
135 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9808 readers
89 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Elon Musk buys Trump's re-election. Trump drops safety regulation and crash reporting requirements for self driving cars and pushes for their mass adoption.

Guys, I'm starting to wonder if there might be any link between those things... But it couldn't possibly be blatant overt corruption. I mean, people wouldn't tolerate such a scandal regardless of political affiliation, right? Right?

Oh right, they became completely desensitized to it.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The math doesn't work. Physics doesn't work this way. Nothing scales like the proposed future of self driving cars. I know it was the vision of the 1950's to have a personal vehicle for everyone, but there's just no way to shoehorn the total volume of vehicles into a city based around people and people-scale areas. We've tried and all it does is make a dangerous, shitty, and unhealthy space with a single office building and miles of car storage around it.

This is just another money and power giveaway to Musk and the tech bros that bankrolled the campaign. The sheer scale of the damage it will cause to our cities is going to be generational, not to mention the damage to our planet's greenhouse gas budget.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

America still hasn't recovered from all the public transport being torn up nearly a century ago

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No no you don't understand: the cars will simply drive themselves around which means they can just endlessly circle the block instead of parking, creating more traffic and wasting more energy... Shit where was I going with this

[–] finder585@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Physics doesn’t work this way.

Nonsense! With a fleet of self-driving pods our valued customers can enjoy getting to work on time every time* with our premium packages starting at $399.99 /mo!

*Not guaranteed

*Terms and conditions apply

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

*** introductory 50% offer for 30 days

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I don't disagree that damage would/will be done, but how much is the question. Money has already been allocated and contracts signed for public transportation improvement in my area. Could this be retroactively cancelled? I guess we'll find out.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago

Sounds just like Musk's infrastructure fantasy. Surely a coincidence.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Private highways"... built on public land.

[–] azl@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

Sounds a lot like railroads to me.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

Trump has never driven himself, so he doesn't understand literally any of the arguments against it. He just sees a way to avoid paying a chauffeur

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

Man, who are Fox/Musk proposing would pay for the bridge replacement? Do they think the shipping company that destroyed it would pay for the whole thing?