He'll lose the civil case for wrongful death that the father filed. What doesn't make sense is the jury being deadlocked on the higher charge but finding him not guilty on the lesser charge. They couldn't decide if he committed manslaughter but could decide that he didn't commit negligent homicide? Even his lawyers couldn't believe this would happen and that's why they were requesting a mistrial.
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
106 points (97.3% liked)
News
23655 readers
3780 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You'll notice a significant overlap between the people who cheer this verdict and the 'all lives matter' crowd.
Can I choke a person responsible for killing thousands with greedy/bad corporate policy?
In the last week, we learned that the answer this question is: absolutely yes. You’ll probably get away with it too.
He’s definitely going to jail. Unfortunately. The jury will be persuaded.
The news alert about the police catching a suspect came out about five minutes after I posted that last comment.
Damn
Hopefully he can charm the jury, or lift his shirt and show off those abs. Wooo. I’d kill a CEO to be on that jury.
Mmmm, murderous abs…
I am sorry, but anyone who has ever choked out someone knows to release when they go limp. He did not release and held him for several minutes.