this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2311 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australia and Nauru signed a security treaty requiring Nauru to consult Canberra before entering security or infrastructure agreements with other nations, effectively limiting Chinese influence.

In return, Australia will provide AUD 100 million over five years and ensure banking access for the island nation, addressing issues caused by Western banks withdrawing.

The treaty follows China’s increasing presence in the Pacific, including agreements with Kiribati and the Solomon Islands, and Nauru’s recent shift from Taiwan to China diplomatically.

Australia frames the deal as bolstering regional security and stability.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The article doesn't really make it clear what's strategically important about having a security deal with Nauru.

I mean it looks like it's kind of in the middle of nowhere and could easily just be avoided by the Chinese military or their expansionist plans.

[–] MicroWave@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Because China wants to dominate this region and recently signed a secret military pact with the Solomon Islands, for example:

China’s influence increased significantly during the term of Manele’s predecessor, with the country switching diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China and striking a secretive security pact that has raised fears of China’s security forces gaining a foothold in the region long dominated by the U.S., Australia and New Zealand.

...

The security pact has raised concerns of a Chinese naval presence in the region and the basing of ground troops that could challenge other countries’ access to the region that lies close to Australia and over which Japan and the U.S. fought savage battles during World War II.

https://apnews.com/article/china-solomon-islands-us-taiwan-pacific-dc2e984ec5045060524c644ebf62b910

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would imagine they're going to pursue similar deals with the other island nations in the area, then possibly start building military ties & bases.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

That might be it, thanks.