this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
54 points (98.2% liked)

UK Politics

3113 readers
342 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Can't wait for a Brexin and have them losing all the special treatment they used to have as members of the Union!

[–] Hossenfeffer 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Worth it, tho. I'm in.

[–] HumanPenguin 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

As much as I hate Brexin as a name. Brin is better.

Honestly, us brits that watched from the mid 80s. (was born in 70). And supported the EU agree with you.

We had a huge majority to join in 74. But never really seemed to feel a part of the union.

Much of it was our gov and media blaming the EU for crap. Heck, to the point, the EU had a website dedicated to UK press lies.

But none of the UK press seemed to take up that story until Brexit. When the harm was already done. Even then it was minimal.

Honestly, we seem to have some of the most corrupt press in Europe.

i mean the uk never felt a part of the union because they demanded special treatment to keep them different like not adopting the euro, etc.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Yep, the media really fuck us over. Ran by oligarchs, most of them

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

It was always destined to be that dumb.

[–] mrmule@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Awaiting Breentry

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I agree with the idea that the UK should foster closer ties with the EU (and that they should rejoin), but this poll seems really badly formed. Respondents were given four options:

  • Getting a free trade agreement with the USA (28%)
  • A closer trading relationship with the EU (49%)
  • Don't know (21%)
  • Prefer not to say (2%)

So it presents two main options which 1) are not mutually exclusive and more importantly 2) represent a false dichotomy. Despite this, there is no option for "Neither", "Both", or "Other" – instead just "Don't know". Given people in the UK have had nearly a decade to develop strong opinions on trade with the EU after it came to the fore with Brexit, the pretty large 21% "Don't know" seems to reflect that a lot of people whose vote would have said "Neither" probably fell into "Don't know". The option about the EU is extremely vague about a "closer trading relationship" which could mean a million different things to different people, while the one about the US is strictly "a free trade agreement".

[–] HumanPenguin 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorta like the brexit vote.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It really does have an interesting parallel, doesn't it?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Has anyone in US said they are interested in free trade either with UK or EU? Last time it was dangled for UK, it got cancelled.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Britain about as dumb as the US.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure who wins in a battle or cutting off their economic nose to spite their face in the ring between ignorant, manipulable racists in the UK vs. the US. Truly a bout for the ages, going 10 rounds for sure.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, we are basically father and son, and the apple didn't fall very far from the tree.

[–] HumanPenguin 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Technically, France is more daddy to the US. Given its France they turned to when separating from the UK. We're more of the laudanum addicted mummy, blaming them for the fact we got old and ugly.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

France was just the new legal guardian. The UK was the abusive father that had child protective services called on them.

[–] HumanPenguin 3 points 2 days ago

Ah so France is the US stepdad.

And suddenly a lot of modern porn makes more sense.

countries should turn away from the dollar and fight trump on every stand but what will happen is they'll all grovel toward him and normalise him because they'd rather pander to the far right in their countries instead of the majority of their citizens.