this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
314 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3551 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Anything Biden could do, could easily be undone by Trump.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I want the US to take back their production of Hemp

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Biden was 6 when Reefer Madness came out. I doubt he understands it in a modern context.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats, the reason we lost is that we didn’t singularly campaign to Republicans in Detroit. That is the only deciding vote. 20 Republicans in Detroit. In 2028 it is TANTAMOUNT that we knock on 1 Republican door in Pennsylvania and 15 doors in Detroit.

[–] MouldyCat 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Uh it’s pronounced “Paramount+”, thanks

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But then the democrats couldn't dangle it in front of us next election.

[–] Homescool@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

We are still working on legalizing abortion with a simple law after 50 years. These things take time.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good old "Nothing will fundamentally change" Joe.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They say Biden, I hear complicit.

It's amazing how a being without a spine sat in the White House chair for four years without falling over.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Hey now at least he helped start a genocide.

What a legacy.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

slavers gonna slave

that is our legacy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Guessing weed business would boom, and government gain a tonne of tax, which Trump would take credit for.

So no. Can't see him doing it.

[–] Thebular@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

They're not calling for hi m to legalize it, the letter they wrote is asking him to reschedule it from a schedule 1 drug to a schedule 3 drug. Still can't see him doing it.

[–] admin@maple.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Big tax cash cow here in Canada, that's for sure.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

Entertainingly only really for the federal government. Of all the provinces only Alberta and PEI have broke even or made anymoney.

Not saying there is not potential tax revenues, just that right now most provinces spend more then they collect for one (corruption) reason or another (needing to be seen being "tough" on drugs).

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Crime Bill Biden ran out the clock on purpose. He never had any intention to reschedule cannabis.

NONE.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The only meaningful change for this would be via legislation, otherwise trump can just as easily undo it the same day.

Edit: looks like the process is much more complicated and actually Biden already started the process at the beginning of this year (April): https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/update-deas-efforts-reschedule-cannabis-what-you-need-know-2024-09-11/ , I don't understand this article

Edit 2: the letter is actually asking him to try to hurry the process up (the article from September that I linked says there supposed to be hearing scheduled this Monday (Dec 2nd)). It is very misleading (as you can see from the comments), because it implies Biden is just ignoring this issue completely.

https://lee.house.gov/imo/media/doc/letter_to_biden_admin_re_marijuana.pdf

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

Trump can just undo it anyway. What's the point. And saying that's not how its done is pointless cause they don't play by the rules.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

He actually started the process to review what it was scheduled as to get it changed in 2022. It like everything else surrounding our government takes forever.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-submits-proposed-regulation-reschedule-marijuana

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (14 children)

He was never going to do it and never will.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Biden, smiling as he puts on shades and eats ice cream: "No. Peace, I'm out."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›