this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
171 points (95.2% liked)

Fediverse

28490 readers
632 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No matter which sort you use (except for new), content is recommended to you by activity. Depending on the sort (active, hot, top) it uses a slightly different mixture of votes/comments/time since post to determine the order.

The only exception is scaled, which boosts a little bit midsized communities, but still doesn’t manage to improve visibility of niche ones.

If lemmy is to truly start having active hobbyist communities instead of being 95% lefty US politics, Shitposts, and some tech stuff, it needs a sort that takes into account the user’s engagement.

For example, if I upvote / comment often in a community, there should be an option to have posts from the community be boosted in my feed, even if it’s a tiny community. 

Let’s say I’m subscribed to !world@lemmy.world and !news@lemmy.world because I want to occasionally see news. However, I’m also subscribed to a couple hundred other communities, some of them who don’t manage to get more than a couple upvotes on their biggest posts. And whenever I see them I’m replying/upvoting because I’m passionate about that topic. 

My feed shouldn’t be 95% c/news and c/world because those are the most upvoted and commented. I shouldn’t have to scroll down hundreds of posts to find “big” posts in small communities I interact with at any opportunity I get. 

That’s why I think it would be beneficial to lemmy if the sort/algorithm took into account your engagement in a way.

It doesn’t have to be complicated, you can have a single number “engagement score” for every community calculated with a basic formula, and that number is used as a boost to the community. 

I’m aware that there are some examples of successful niche communities on lemmy. But that’s mainly because either a significant chunk of the lemmy userbase is into that niche (let’s face it the lemmy community is not a representative sample of the world population, we tend to be very similar people), or because the posts on it are simplified image/video type posts which appeal to people who don’t know much about the subject.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Isn't that the difference between "active" and "hot?"

One is just upvotes; the other is votes and comments.

I don't think it would help, to be honest. A dead community not being posted to still won't show up on your feed if you sort by engagement.

[–] Aurelius@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Hi, I created the Lemmy client Quiblr which includes a For You feed which constantly evolves with the types of posts you interact with. 100% private and on-device (i.e. no data leaves your device).

On quiblr, you can use the "For You" sort like any other sort option

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 1 points 4 hours ago

Nice. I will try it. Do I have to keep Quiblr cookies for the option to work?

[–] iso@lemy.lol 40 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

I agree that fediverse needs a personalized "explore" page in general. For example, this is the only plus feature of Bluesky over Mastodon (in terms of technology). It is obvious how big difference it makes.

I generally avoid the evil algorithms found on other social networks, but I hope we see that in Lemmy.

[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Good algorithm should:

  • be open-source for users
  • be togglable
  • boost engagement boost on positive emotions
  • be personalized
  • promote niche communities
  • promote balanced political debate (probably the hardest)
[–] macroplastic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I think to trying meet all of these without compromises (such as privacy and performance) is basically impossible. How would one boost engagement on positive emotions or personalize without large data mining efforts, model building, and running text classification on every comment or post?

I agree they are good aspirations.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] macroplastic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

This looks cool, but I would prefer to not pass my credentials to a third party, especially for features that should probably be in the default client.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Aurelius@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I made quiblr. It's a lemmy client that includes a For You option

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's plenty of communities where I have no interest in discussing things with the masses. I like smaller communities with thoughtful posters who care more about the subject matter than being heard. That's the beauty of Lemmy. Not everything has to be perfect for everyone.

[–] macroplastic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Engagement does not exclusively mean commenting or posting; voting is also engagement. If you just want to lurk, why have an account in the first place?

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I didn't say I wanted to lurk. I'm just saying I find beehaw's Technology community more to my preference than LW's

[–] macroplastic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

That's fair, I guess I just don't see the connection to OP. From how you phrased this I assumed you were disagreeing.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 days ago (9 children)

The biggest problem with lemmy for me is the multiple "duplicate" communities.

There should be a feature to combine them at the client level. So the 3 different "privacy" communities could just be viewed as one on my lemmy client

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The "duplicate" communities are housed on different websites. Websites that could very well have their own norms, rules, and culture. Lumping them together and treating them as the same thing is just kind of invasive to them, and promotes bad netiquette.

Just pick one that you like best.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thats why i said client side view. Each servers community doesnt know i'm viewing 3 communities together on my phone and it doesnt affect them

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 20 points 5 days ago

Multicommunities would also help with that. News communities would not flood your general feed anymore if you were able to have a specific feed for them

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This sounds like the sort of thing that's best solved with a 'favourite' option that pushes posts from favourited communities to the top of the feed. No need to get in there and over-complicate it with bespoke weightings or anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

PieFed has some features that I find helpful in this regard.

One is the Categories of Communities. You'll only see News in the News category or in the non-category search methods (standard Subscribed/All/New/etc.).

Another is the ability to follow - and arguably more important unfollow - everything. Including communities, posts, people, etc. I once made the mistake of replying to a comment in ChapoTrapHouse@hexbear.net, and another in Lemmygrad.ml, and the replies kept coming for WEEKS and WEEKS - I almost quit the Fediverse entirely at that point, and I hear that scenario repeated by others as well. But on PieFed, not only can I unfollow any conversation at any time, but unlike Lemmy it also allows a true blocking of all users from any instance you choose (edit: to clarify, I mean without requiring an admin to do it for you and everyone else on the same instance at the same time - a personal defederation that affects nobody else, just like a block, except that Lemmy doesn't allow blocking users from instances, only communities from instances which is nowhere close to being the same thing).

Ofc nothing is perfect - e.g. I decided to unfollow poetry@lemmy.world bc I don't want to read 5 of those in a row every morning, and rather would want to savor just one at a time. Also it would be nice to separate comment replies (that seem more urgent, for the sake of an active conversation) from e.g. a new post that you haven't seen yet? But for a true niche community, with let's say less than a handful of posts every day and you want to be notified about every single one? It seems perfect for that.

The UI for PieFed needs far more polish, especially outside of the narrow range of short comments on posts with few of those in number. e.g. far too often the existing notifications don't work as the reply to your comment got buried away onto some other page entirely, in an effort to streamline reading but then that not interacting well with the newer (unfinished?) notifications feature. But while it lacks much polish that Lemmy's UI and apps have, it also has so many features like those mentioned above that Lemmy lacks as well, and may move faster in its development due to using a more common programming language. It is so nice to have choices to pick from:-).

Otherwise on Lemmy you could make alts, like one subscribed to News communities, another for Memes and Shitposts, etc. Blocking users would get super annoying bc you'd have to do it multiple times. Blocking the largest news communities and the accounts that usually fill them, and then sorting by New can help, but it requires enormous curation efforts to get there and even then falls far short of what you asked - e.g. you also, still have to bookmark or otherwise check each one of your highly active communities one by one (edit: I mean niche ones here, bc the chances of seeing a post there on New can still be slim, if you are concerned about seeing EVERY post there rather than just find something to read from across hundreds of subscribed communities, so different solutions for different workflows).

Lemmy is great for checking memes, reading tech or politics news, and liking Linux - but for everything else it needs improvements to be made to support. I'm not going back to Reddit though:-).

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

No matter which sort you use (except for new),

Yes, sorting by new is best. The rest of the post seems irrelevant.

I wish the web ui (and apps) could work like an old fashioned usenet reader, where it would list your subscribed communities and say how many unread posts each one had. I don't like having all the communities jumbled together. That seems fixable.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago

Man, do I have good news for you:

nodeBB

Discourse

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Scaled sort was implemented in 0.19.0, is that not sufficient? https://join-lemmy.org/news/2023-12-15_-_Lemmy_Release_v0.19.0_-_Instance_blocking,_Scaled_sort,_and_Federation_Queue

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I mentioned scaled sort in my post. Yes it boosts communities with less activity (in practice this tends to be midsized communities as I mentioned in my post), but it does so generally. What my post is advocating for is a sort that boosts the communities you tend to engage with a lot, not every community that is less active.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 8 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Try Quiblr. It's a lemmy client with exactly the features you ask for. It checks your engagement, and filters and sorts your feed based on what it learned from your habits.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Let’s say I’m subscribed to !world@lemmy.world and !news@lemmy.world because I want to occasionally see news.

I have this exact problem and it's maddening. Fucking "news", which is mostly just political posts about how shitty Republicans are completely drowns out all of my smaller niche communities!

I don't know how to fix the problem but the USER needs some way to control their feed. We either need to be able to throttle the larger communities or boost the smaller ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›