this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
293 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59693 readers
2792 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
293
Open source fights back: 'We won't get patent-trolled again' (www.zdnet.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by mox@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 107 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tldr, to help fight patent trolls:

They're asking you to find evidence of preexisting technology -- referred to by patent lawyers as "prior art" -- that can kill off bad patents. This could be open-source documentation (including release notes), published standards or specifications, product manuals, articles, blogs, books, or any publicly available information.

They use this info to essentially undercut and invalidate the patent trolls' filing, killing their ability to file suit on that patent again.

There's also a contest with a $3000 prize for anyone who can help kill a current one on their plate.

https://patroll.unifiedpatents.com/contests/s3vQkRdTC6coNkjyx

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It sounds like they need proof that this tech existed before 2013? I'm new to patents.. how does this evidence kill the patent?

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Can't file a patent on something that someone else already made.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 63 points 2 weeks ago

Another way to help: If you have an idea that someone could possibly patent, no matter how stupid you think it is, you can publish a defensive technical disclosure on tdcommons for free https://www.tdcommons.org/

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine a society where people who generate value have to waste their energy fighting these shit stains.

Congress wont do their jobs lol

[–] Odelay42@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: congress does their jobs exactly how their corporate owners want them to. Congress does not serve the best interests of the people.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 week ago

most normies aint ready for this reality, but you aint wrong.

if we take facts based approach, ie just look at what they do, not what they say, this conclusion is self-evident.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Maybe crowdsource hitmen.

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

if you are known to look at patents then you become a target of patent trolls.

i advise good OPSEC.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OPSEC "operational security" is protecting yourself from harm with safe practices, study and research, and technology

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

OPSEC Savvy Ostrich approves.

[–] canadaduane@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I love this approach.

Nit: "If you can find prior art that describes such a system before June 13, 2013, you could be a winner." ... 2013 is a typo I'm guessing?

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

That’s not the submission deadline, that’s the priority date for this particular patent, basically when it was first filed. If people can find other published information describing what the patent covers that predates the filing it would help invalidate the patent.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 week ago

How about we work to change how the patent office operates? I think it's ridiculous you can get a patent for a thing that doesn't actually fucking exist, among many other really stupid things they approve or deny.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Somebody call Lee Cheng