this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
215 points (85.5% liked)

Linuxsucks

183 readers
84 users here now

Rules:

  1. FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
  2. Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic.
  3. No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Now I wanna know if you can compile wine on windows. Maybe through something like Cygwin.

[–] techwithjake@lemm.ee 61 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

WINE isn't linux exclusive though. It works on MacOS and would pointless on Windows.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)
  • install VMware on Windows
  • run virtual machine
  • install Linux in VM
  • install WINE
  • run Windows version of VMware
  • run virtual machine
  • install Linux in VM
  • install WINE
  • run Windows version of VMware ...
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Through a mirror, darkly.

[–] _____@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

this is one of those thoughts you have when you shake in bed trying to desperately awake from a nightmare

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Quick someone try and see how deep we can go. I don't wanna do it, no ambition.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Does vmware still support binary emulation nowadays?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

WINE
Is
Not
Exclusive

[–] death_to_carrots@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

Actually, a long time ago – it was the good old Wine 0.9.8 time – I suggested that one could use Wine on Windows (WoW basically) to get an old application to run. Which worked.

The rational was that it worked on Linux with Wine, but no compat mode on Windows XP(?) was able to run this piece oft software.

It was a wilder time back then.

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Years ago, my employer had a timecard computer that people would remote desktop into to fill out there timecard every day, since the software wouldn't run on modern windows (I think we were up to windows 10 at the time. One day, the old the old server finally died. For a while we emailed our hours until we found a solution. That solution ended up being a Fedora VM running the payroll software under Wine.

[–] helloworld55@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Glad to see the creativity there, that's hilarious

[–] peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think it'd be pointless on windows. I have better luck running 16 bit windows programs on wine than I do using modern windows.

[–] techwithjake@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Extremely niche but point taken.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And the BSDs support it too, right?

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] accideath@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, but they are somewhat similar. macOS is based on freeBSD which is based on research unix.

Linux is not based on unix but it was written to resemble unix very closely and work similar to it. There’s a lot of intercompatibility but they have different heritages.

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

*and NetBSD

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

No. MacOS has ties closer to BSD.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

I make all kinds of shitty apps that I never bother to port to windows.

[–] emrikol@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve ran WINE on Windows before for legacy compatibility reasons and just to see how it worked.

I don’t know if this is the project I used, but it sounds similar: https://github.com/otya128/winevdm

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

uhm the entire kde and gnome app ecosystem?
some did get ported to Windows but its not the primary target and these ports usually have significant issues.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's another thing that should work fine on BSD.

The only Linux exclusive software I can think of is a bunch of drivers.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

They are Sporting mesa RADV to windows, só that's changing lol

Tons of Qt/KDE apps work just fine on windows, macOS, *BSD, and even Haiku OS.

[–] twinnie 1 points 1 week ago

I hear the petition to get KMail ported to Windows just hit a gazillion signatures.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

Dolphin has a windows version

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

softwares

1 software

This is how I know someone doesn't work in software.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

it also misuses the meme. Top right is meant to ask Andy Samberg to name several examples, to which he is to respond with the name of a taxonomy or hierarchy that contains multiple examples of such.

[–] SatyrSack@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

I work with plenty of developers who say "softwares" because English is not our first language

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] kelargo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

And gparted

The zoo of mediocre audio subsystems Linux has might be exclusive to Linux.

You can get Wine on mac

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 5 points 2 weeks ago

I was gonna say SuperTuxKart but it's available for Linux, Windows, macOS, and Android per their site.

[–] philluminati@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Wine runs on Windows as is a good way to emulate some Windows 98 apps that no longer work in Windows 11 I’ve been told.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually no, wine is pretty handy within wsl on windows to restrict windows apps to certain folders on your system

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be easier to run the program as an user with restricted access...?

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not if you want to just pop it up with a single command line and close it as quickly

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You could just write a small script for that? There must be something like su

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Su isn't on windows, and does the exact opposite to restricting filesystem access to a specific subset

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

su allows you to swap to another user in shell, not just make yourself root.

'runas' looks like it'd do just the job

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

runas can do that, yes. Now how are you planning yo also create that user in the same command line? And to dispose of it automatically when the process ends?

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

runas can do that, yes. But it won't make you a virtual file system, or give you a nat firewall.

One use case for this is the backblaze backup utility. It's kinda stupid in that it has an all-or-nothing approach to backups.

Putting it in a container restricts it in a much easier and reliable way than running it with a special user account.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 weeks ago

You had me right up till the end.....nice work.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Some of the only things I could think of would be desktop environments on their own, but I don't have a clue whether they work on wsl considering I gave up on it real quick after flowblade didn't work on it due to inexperience.

load more comments
view more: next ›