this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
255 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5629 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump joked that assassins would have to shoot through the fake news to reach him, protected by bulletproof glass. He also claimed his ability to weave nonsensical talking points together was a sign of his intelligence.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 108 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The quote you're looking for:

"And I have a piece of glass over here, and I don't have a piece of glass there, and I have this piece of glass here," he opined. "But all we have really over here is the fake news, right?"

"And to get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news, and I don't mind that so much," he continued. "I don't mind, I don't mind that."

He's talking in the first part about bulletproof glass, and then "all we really have over here is the fake news" is when he is pointing at what I believe to be the press area. He points again while saying "somebody would have to shoot through," completing this gesture with his pointed right hand coming slightly back to himself, as though to mimic the path of a bullet.

Donald Trump has suggested that the press he doesn't like should be shot, and that he "[wouldn't] mind that." It's hardly a leap to think that as president, he would pardon anyone would would shoot those who oppose him.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Sir? Yes. Hi. Man Manly from *any fucking news*. Let me just ask, "What the fuck?"

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

He is more and more a bumbling idiot, and yet we try to find sense behind his words.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

He has called the press "the enemy of the people" for years now. We all know what dictators do to their self-declared "enemies of the people". But for some reason a lot of that same press is so intent on sanewashing him.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please take this Orange Turd and shovel him into a dumpster.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We keep trying to flush this turd. Was donnie projecting when he said this? "People are flushing toilets 10 times, 15 times, as opposed to once."

He keeps popping up no matter how times normal Americans flush.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Gosh more stochastic terrorism from the GOP's favorite terrorist.

Guy's so repulsive, even bullets instinctively avoid him. Bad news for us and anyone standing behind him.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They've already shot at him twice. He's asking for more?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, he's got bullet proof glass. He pointed towards the press pit when he said that.

Hes saying hes okay with someone shooting at the press.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Just once I believe, by the kid. If I remember right the second incident the guy had a rifle, but didn't take a shot, Secret Service shot at him.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, 3rd time wasn't the charm. Maybe lucky 4.