"Democracy dies in darkness" was aspirational.
Anyway, good job dipshit, now you've made a much bigger story about the fact that the WaPo endorses Harris and Bezos doesn't.
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
404 points (99.5% liked)
politics
19089 readers
5460 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm from Germany, which means that we learned an re-iterated the history around the crumbling of Democracy in the Weimar Republic and the rise of the 3rd Reich in school, in several different subjects.
And now, more than 20 years since I graduated, I still don't understand how people could vote for Hitler with his rhetoric and his hatefulness. I sit here and can't believe that Donald Trump has realistic chances to win, and he will get votes from people who should know better and not only the votes from obvious Nazis. It's depressing.
I'm not British or German, but wasn't there a state victory for a far-right party in Germany recently?
It feels like many people learned how horrible this stuff is, but a mixture of hate and ignorance trumps knowledge.
You're right. Tge AfD won the most seats in Thuringia. History rhymes. I guess one important factor is cognitive dissonance. I understand that people are unhappy with current politics for multiple reasons and I think some want to believe the propaganda in tge hopes that things will get better but knowing deep in themselves that these demagogues don't promote any policies that will actually help them. At least I hope so.
That's probably fair. There was a great article around the sociology of Brexit, with the main takeaway being that with the right rising in Europe, a Trump presidency wasn't as unlikely as some made it out to be the first time. What they determined was that when things are shit with no hope of things improving, people will happily take what they perceive as short-term pain for long-term gain.
For many, they'll happily tank their economy and destroy their healthcare systems if it means fewer brown people - and that's a really depressing thing we're seeing practically everywhere.
I believe you're thinking of Austria and while that's scary as fuck the party is so politically unpopular that while they won a plurality they've failed to form government.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn02w01xr2jo
It was both countries, sadly.
Not comparable at all.
In Austria it was the whole country that voted, in Germany it was „only“ a state that represents 2.5% of Germanys population.
Still concerning, but historically the east of Germany tends to elect way more right wing politicians and it still only makes up 15% of the population in total.
Im the west of Germany, far right parties have much less voters. Still too many, but not enough to put them in a position where they can get into power.
It’s here people. The oligarchs are taking over the US. It’s not just Trump, it’s the whole clique. To them Putin isn’t just daddy, Russia is a rolemodel. A society run by oligarchs held together by one strongman. And the people… whahaha.
Which is insane considering how often those billionaires fall out of windows. What a country to emulate if you're adequately afraid of heights.
This guy famously sent himself to lower earth orbit to intellectually jerk off in front of the planet.
Bezos is bowing to Trump
I think it's the other way around, but same problem.
That article was really worth reading. Thank you for posting it. I didn't know how much upheaval there has been surrounding endorsements in the field of journalism. It's crazy that we've gotten to the point where the owners of two major papers both got involved to stop an endorsement over the same election against the same candidate. The article mentions that people have been canceling their subscriptions in protest, but... it doesn't seem like enough.
Subscriptions don't make their money. Advertisers do.
Until they start losing advertisers, they won't change a fucking thing.
Two that we know of. They're all owned by fascist lizard people.
Kind of get the feeling that Bezos may be on Epstein's list
Wish we could all be smart enough to drop Amazon in protest.
Columbia Journalism Review - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Columbia Journalism Review:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.cjr.org/political_press/the-washington-post-opinion-editor-approved-a-harris-endorsement-a-week-later-the-papers-publisher-killed-it.php