this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
337 points (96.7% liked)

Today I Learned

18088 readers
916 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And yes, I'm also shocked and saddened that there is a Caillou fandom site.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 107 points 2 months ago (2 children)

All episodes of Caillou were banned in my house. That little shit taught my son how to whine.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

My kids never got caillou but they still figured out the whining bit.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

That's called being a kid.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 62 points 2 months ago (2 children)

reading that list, they just didnt like airing normal but negative young-chlid behavior. gotta keep it sterile, dontchaknow

no taking toys, no throwing tantrums. no pointing out when your parents are exhausted.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I agree with what you're saying in principle, but I don't think toddlers need realistic depictions of toddlers on TV to emulate.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i thought the point of the show was to depict real world solutions to those problematic behaviors, which the show seemed to do well. it wasnt just kids being jerks and 'fini'

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 112 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but toddlers aren't too bright. You show Caillou throwing sand in his friend's eyes, they might copy that even if Caillou learned his lesson. Because they didn't learn Caillou's lesson.

Toddlers have a lot of difficulty putting themselves in someone else's shoes, but very little trouble copying behavior they see on TV.

I mean I didn't show my kid Caillou in the first place because he's an annoying little shit and why would I have when there's an internet full of classic Sesame Street and Mr. Rogers for her to watch? Between that and Blue's Clues, we were pretty set with stuff to keep her entertained during TV time.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

i had no problem showing this kind of stuff to my 4 kids oh so long ago. i dont recall anything negative happening because of it. its definitely not, 'set them in front and walk away material'.. parents need to be present to explain stuff to the very young.

i also had the classics, but they seem to gravitate towards spongebob as their long term favorite even as they aged.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This might just come down to the kids too. My eldest would likely be like yours and pick up the lesson ,but my youngest would 1000% emulate the bad behavior, dodge the lesson, and think it was funny that he got the same consequences as the kid on tv.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I would have learned the lesson then emulated the behavior anyway because I was a little shit.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it's unlikely that they got enough complaints to remove those episodes from rebroadcasts if kids weren't imitating his behavior.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Broadcasters are weak willed and the people complaining about things are usually Karens. And since Karens bitch loudly, they often get their way just so they will shut the fuck up.

Just look at some of the things the MPAA considers as essentially requirements to force things into a higher rating tier. They're basically just applying puritanical beliefs into the ratings to try and appease Karens, regardless of reality. And even those are applied wildly inconsistently.

The Kings Speech was given an R rating for language. The word Fuck is used several times in one scene ina. Medical context of speech therapy. Meanwhile, Gunner Palace, a documentary about soldiers in the Iraq War, uses the word Fuck 42 times, twice in a sexual context, and was only rated PG-13.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (2 children)

One episode he punches a baby. That is like number 1 on the list of things you don't punch. There are the obvious examples of types of babies that are ok to punch. E.g. zombie, demon, Hitler, etc.

[–] SmokumJoe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Punching a knife might be worse

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Medically yes. Morally, maybe not.

[–] rocketpoweredredneck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That depends, is this knife a baby?

[–] SmokumJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Or a baby threatening me with a knife

[–] mydoomlessaccount@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A baby made of horribly caustic acid that is actively moving toward other babies, and all you have available to stop it is punches. Good to punch, or bad to punch? 🤔

(The baby is much faster than you. It will reach the other babies before you can. It is about to pass you, though it hasn't yet done so, and all you have time to do is to give it a quick, decisive strike to knock it off-course)

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] other_cat@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fandom engages in a lot of anti-user and anti-creator practices. There are mirrors to it that privacy and content respecting, particularly Antifandom and BreezeWiki. If you are interested in making the switch, there are plugins that will automatically redirect you away from Fandom towards one of these mirrors.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Ah, thank you for explaining.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I'll concede that I am confused all the time too. Hooray for being old.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

“Caillou” is what we would call out our kids for being whiny. We used him as an example of how not to act and would call our kids “Caillou” when they started getting out line. Surprisingly effective.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Cailou is a little whiny brat and always has been. I hated that show when my son was younger.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (7 children)

We stuck with Blue's Clues.

That said, my wife and I were convinced that Steve had severe brain damage and was living in his own inner world. When he "went off to college," he was actually being institutionalized.

You have to entertain yourself somehow with this stuff when you have to sit through it every day.

At least she wasn't into Barney or Teletubbies.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 7 points 2 months ago

These days at least we have streaming services. If you can get them hooked on the good stuff (eg Bluey) or the tolerable stuff (eg Octonauts) you can (mostly) get away from the worst stuff (Cocomelon and it's million somehow even more cheaply made derivatives).

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Blues Clues was good. We banned Barney from the git go. We loved Wow wow Wubsy, Wonderpets and The Backyardigans. I didn’t mind those at all.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Ours were Blues Clues, In the Night Garden (a British show from the people who made Teletubbies, but amazingly not annoying) and classic Sesame Street and Mr. Rogers on YouTube.

I did let her watch Dora despite how awful it was. Because that was some me time. I was a stay at home dad.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

His mom tho.

They had to be careful how they drew her in swimwear or doing yoga, sadly.

[–] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

P.S. Caillou means pebble en français. pebblehead

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not going to question this image…

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I am. Wtf. 🤨

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, it says that he acted like prick but always learned his lesson in the end, what's the issue?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Toddler brains are usually not developed enough to go, "oh! Okay! I get it now!" from a TV show.

[–] hex@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Because a lot of kids wouldn't watch the whole episode and think the first part is how they're supposed to behave... Kids don't have a very long attention span and caillous visuals were kinda odd. I remember feeling as a kid "These edges of the screen really take me out of the immersion", or at least the kid-equivalent of that feeling.

load more comments
view more: next ›