I’d say that’s progress actually. Especially if the rubbish is plastic.
Burning coal, natural gas, and wood used to be the dirtiest. So wouldn’t this mean the UK is using less of those fuels? Or is the headline simply misleading?
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5229 readers
689 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
How about reading it? Where you'd find they abandoned all coal burning a month ago
Article doesn’t say anything about wood burning or natural gas. Previously they mentioned how bad wood burning is for energy production. There’s nothing clean about cutting down trees, or digging up gas, and then processing it, putting it on a diesel burning cargo ship and sending it halfway around the world to be burned.
But disposing of local non-recyclable plastics and making them into electricity is pretty close to the the “reuse” part of reduce/reuse/recycle.
I’m not attacking you — I’m just pointing out how the BBCs claim that burning rubbish is the “dirtiest” form of UK power generation seems a bit iffy.
Yeah no how do you even come up with this shit