AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

702 readers

316 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

DougHolland@lemmy.world

Green stooge Jill Stein paid $100,000 to a Republican consulting firm led by a suspected January 6 rioter (www.salon.com)

submitted 1 month ago by DougHolland@lemmy.world to c/aiop@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(archived link)

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 month ago

Interestingly the US greens seem to no longer be a part of Global Greens. I wonder why that is? /s

There's still a Russian green party there.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

A spokesperson for Stein said she was unaware of Pool's reported connection to Jan. 6; a lawyer for Pool insisted his client was filming a documentary, not taking part in the attack.

[+] Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works -22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lol! Only 2 weeks ago I made the following post on Reddit in response to a non-American who was asking why 3rd party candidates never won I elections:

"Anytime someone gets close, the media makes them out to be a joke. They bash the third party relentlessly and make the two sides believe that voting for them would be a waste. Because the "Big Club" (ref. George Carlin) doesn't want any other parties involved. And people are just stupid enough to know they are being duped but go along with it anyway.

Then, we get to the point of no return and voters are made to believe that if they vote for the third party candidate, they are actually voting for tyranny. And it ALWAYS works.

The USA doesn't want to be free. We don't want to make things better. We want to WIN!!! No matter the issue, no matter the consequences, no matter what you believe, "I need the validation of my team winning!" WIN!! WIN!! WIN!!!

That's all that matters."

And now every other post is a "How Jill Stein is a piece of shit" post.

We deserve this fucking clown show.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your reaction to yet more proof that jill stein is not a serious 3rd party candidate is to double down on your belief that she is a serious candidate but also the victim of a massive conspiracy. That's the thought process of a victim of disinformation.

The sad reality is that 3rd party candidates are not viable in our 1st-past-the-post voting system.

If you seriously wanted more than 2 viable parties you'd be advocating for electoral reform, not pretending that russian funded republicans like jill stein are somehow different from the other russian funded republican on the ballot.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think he was half right. Our for-profit capitalist media has done Bernie Sanders dirty over the last 20 years so I don't trust them to be fair and objective towards any 3rd party environmentalist groups that would potentially put sustainability before profits. Dont get me wrong, I think Jill Stein is a Russian sponsored spoiler candidate, but I think the media would shit on her even if her campign was sincere.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

If we had a party that was legitimately dedicated to environmental justice AND we had a political system that allowed minority parties to participate, then yeah, that would be a real threat and the media would be martialled against it.

But I just don't see how the media reaction to third parties matters. Non-ranked voting, non-proportional voting and the electoral college structurally forbid minor parties from being anything but a spoiler.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The electoral college prevents any third party from ever winning. They'd need to get more votes than both other parties combined.

And you know that 60% of people just go and stamp R or D without thinking and will never be convinced to change.

Third parties are ridiculous at the presidential level until we change the voting system.

Vote third party local if you like. But they never run candidates because they don't actually want to win.