this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
38 points (88.0% liked)

askchapo

22698 readers
467 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
38
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by qocu@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
 

I don't understand why there are so many people who consider themselves "Marxist feminists", but at the same time are distracted by astrology.

The origin of feminism is working class, and as a working class movement, it is materialist. I don't know if they at least know what dialectical materialism is, since they don't see such an abysmal contradiction between astrology (pseudoscience) and feminism (materialism).

They remind me of the liberal “feminist” Gloria Steinem.

And the same with some anarchists.

What do you think about it?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

OP, this might seem kinda harsh; and I don't know you so I don't intend to attack you personally; but I feel the need to go off a bit and tell you how this and some of your comments below all comes across. Because

This Whole Thing Smacks of Gender

Judging by your pronoun tag, you're a man telling everyone about how, in the abstract, women "feminists," are "distracted" by things they 'shouldn't be' because it's "irrational" and "pseudoscience," and they "are a problem to the movement" and you apparently know better than such frivolity~ and are here to revoke their 'diamat credentials' because they 'probably don't even understand it.' It reads as some pretty blatant chauvinism and patriarchal denigration that's not based in anything but a misplaced sense of superiority.

Like, can you give me one example where a marxist feminist action has been undermined by someone being interested in this particular personal mysticism? How marxist feminist progress or work has been materially undermined at all by how marxist feminist organizers or others might play with or relate to these things in their free-time? Has any prominent marxist feminist engaged in direct action ever said "I won't work with you bc ur a scorpio" to another comrade engaged in the struggle and split a party over it, and you saw this and were so shaken by it that you feel the need to bring up the concern? Have any of these things happened for this criticism to be rooted in a real reality as a concern for you, and you are not just concern-trolling about 'the sanctity and strength of the marxist feminist movement,' which you may or may not even be a part of, to distance yourself from the visibly likely problematic aspects of your mentality behind it?

Or are you working yourself up in a way that frankly, to me, reads as adjacent to anti-feminist gamergate CHUDS attacking things women like because women like it, and you think it's "silly" and 'beneath you' in some way?

I think you should analyze where this is coming from and maybe do some self-criticism, because this doesn't sound real. I've organized many people, including with many marxists (women and otherwise, cis and otherwise) some of whom were in varying degrees interested in this kind of stuff (with women and non-cis being the most common) and plenty who weren't or practiced other beliefs. And with those of whom were, I've had many quality conversations where it came up and we learned more about each other in how we may or may not relate to or experience supposed signifiers-of-aspects of our personalities represented in these ~jungian-style 'universal archetypes' that astrology is constructed around. Just as I have in different ways with people who had other spiritual/religious beliefs. And at no point at all were these mysticisms or religious beliefs made central or even came up at all in the actual analysis and planning and material action of protests, union organizing, or discussion in theory-study groups or anything. Least of all did it ever cause any harm to our work. Many of those individuals have been more committed, do better and more focused work, and have accomplished more to help working people and further socialism than me even at my most involved; and, again I don't know you, but going off of other people I've encountered who've expressed similar attitudes, I'd find it VERY hard to believe that these people, who I've also never heard speak like this about others' personal religious/spiritual beliefs, are less capable marxists than you.

And any concern about "abysmal contradictions between pseudoscience and materialism" would equally apply to any marxists of any gender being religious or believing in a higher power at all


but you fixating on astrology and women marxist-feminists sets off alarms for me. So I'm not trying to attack you personally, because I don't know you, but I want to communicate to you that it sounds like you either harbor some misogynistic attitudes and chauvinism, or that maybe, you like, heard a classmate you like say something bad about your star sign and you're upset about it and deflecting.

I'm more absurdist when it comes to personal-emotional beliefs. But astrology is just a fun mysticism for some people. For some people it gives them a sense of greater-than-them wonder and/or purpose not so different to what other religion and spirituality does, and without the inbuilt patriarchal structure of most major religions. I've found it can also be an effective tool for self-reflection by externalizing aspects of one's self in an arranged way that expresses the interconnected dialectical strengths-in-weaknesses and vice-versa of aspects of one's personality, to examine separated from your ego. When I was taught about some of this stuff by a coworker years ago, it did genuinely help me embrace and confront parts of myself that I hadn't previously thought about, or struggled with due to over-internalization of toxic patriarchal norms. As well it can just be a fun way of getting to know other people according to how they do or don't relate to certain aspects or signifiers supposedly attached to them, in a way that's not much different from, and in some cases deeper-reaching or more specific than sharing art that we connect with back and forth, as an extension of ourselves to be felt and understood in ways that we might struggle to be otherwise in the course of normal conversation.

Like what is the actual problem here where this needs you to take such a eric-andre stand? There is laughably zero threat of some Kautsky-level "Astrolo-marxist" movement misleading the working class into a world war because 'oops I'm such an aries'. There's no "Astrological Papacy" that owns 1/3 of the land in Europe and is embedded in the governmental structures of nations. It's not that serious. And your saying they're "distracted" and "a problem to the movement" and "not radically useful" like they're only good "pure" marxist feminists if they dedicate every second of every moment (including self-reflection or leisure time) to pure doctrinal historical and dialectical materialism is... it's just weird my dude. Who made you the arbiter of feminism? And do you ever watch TV? Play video games? Shitpost online? Imagine fanciful scenarios in your head? These are all distractions. Why is theirs "worse" than yours? I guarantee you that you tell yourself lies every day that are just as inaccurate and anti-materialist as a given mysticism/religion that someone might resonate with. I don't care how "dialectical-materialist-mensch" you think you are. I do too. We all do to an extent. I think this is all worth you reflecting on.

...
...
In short:
JUST like a Capricorn

[–] Speaker@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Real flashbacks to various pronoun struggle sessions in early Hexbear where an unusually high percentage of people with "serious concerns" shared a certain pronoun tag. 🤔

[–] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Tbh, in the back of my mind I was wondering how much of such a strong reaction against something like astrology in the OP comes from an unstated/unexamined/unconscious bias against some activities women engage in because they're "too emotional." It brings up the old patriarchal dichotomy of irrational women, rational men. I think that should be carefully examined in unpacking the topic of the original post.

[–] josie@vegantheoryclub.org 8 points 2 days ago

This guy has just spent the better part of an hour mansplaining feminism to me, so I'd say you're on the money here.

I hope the original poster actually takes the time to read what anarcho_blinkenist said and actually reflects on his stance.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago

actually it's a fact all capitalists are scorpios

[–] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

go off order-of-lenin thanks for this post. honestly my misogyny alarms start to go off anytime i see a man talk down on or "critique" astrology in any capacity...

[–] Roonerino@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well damn. I'm never gonna judge a witch or astrologer for their spirituality again. Good post.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] erenkoylu@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Astrology is for uneducated morons.

[–] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

we need to stop men from being allowed to post on here until we figure out what's going on

[–] Balthier@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I agree with you 100% All mysticism of any type should be criticised. Like Marx said, one of our tasks is "ruthless criticism of all that exists". Unironic belief in astrology or witchcraft (heavy emphasis on the unironic part so that people don't misconstrue me) should be opposed by any leftist.

[–] grym@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Realistically speaking, who fucking cares?

A whole lot of people spilling ink about astrology, "pseudoscience" and "mysticism" in here that don't seem to know anything about it or its relation to the patriarchal, racial and class contradictions. And a whole lot of people that don't seem directly concerned with most of those things themselves but feel it's important to share their opinions on something they're not informed about and not concerned about.

For the record i don't care for astrology at all, I don't like the (extremely, extremely rare) people who take it 100% seriously, but it's still one of those things that's kinda fun sometimes. But i don't care, and i have no trust in people who are worried about "feminists hurting their own movement by doing things wrong" when they're not a part of that movement.

[–] jolliver_bromwell@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

thanks for posting this out more coherently than I could. I’m no astrologer but the weird ass struggle sessions we have about it tri annually are really fucking dumb and pointless and I’ll point out that we have more than a little catholic apologia on this site pretty consistently and it shouldn’t be controversial to say astrology has done much less material harm to women and leftists generally than the fucking pedo cabal that did literal crusades and genocides and witch burnings

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Taster_Of_Treats@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't understand why there are so many people who consider themselves "Marxist gamers", but at the same time are distracted by video games.

The origin of gaming is working class, and as a working class movement, it is materialist. I don't know if they at least know what dialectical materialism is, since they don't see such an abysmal contradiction between gaming (fantasy) and marxism (materialism).

They remind me of the liberal “gamer” Jason Schreier.

And the same with some anarchists.

What do you think about it?

[–] qocu@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

Your comparison makes no sense.

A conjunct of sciences and disciplines together (mathematics, physics, mechanics, computer science, art, drawing, design, animation) versus esperituality and idealism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I wouldn't necessarily say it's a feminism thing. I think it's a millenial/zoomer thing more than anything. It's sad seeing BS like that get normalized, like, how are we accepting people saying "yes, I actually believe that the positions of given stars and planets affect people's personality and my future"? That's 100% against materialism and against the scientific method.

By "how are we accepting" I don't mean "let's oppress these people", just I think we should collectively adopt the same reaction to it, as if an adult told us about the tooth fairy coming.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anti-patriarchal aspects of witchcraft, as others have eloquently stated here already. Also on some level it's a chicken/egg thing as some point, as girl power culture (I'm sure there's a term for that) embraces certain hobbies and interests. For every girl that seems to embrace dangerous woo-woo shit, there's thirty more that just wanna have fun.

I may have my biases as a former Wiccan, though.

[–] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There's a lot of good history on this in the book, Caliban and the Witch. Witchcraft, mysticism, and astrology were interests, tools, and spaces for women to oppose the church-patriarchy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CrookedSerpent@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago
[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

god forbid women get distracted by anything

[–] josie@vegantheoryclub.org 12 points 2 days ago (11 children)

So what, how dare women have a hobby or interest right?

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imaging a witch with a bloody athame and demon behind her saying this.

[–] josie@vegantheoryclub.org 6 points 2 days ago

It's me, I'm that witch.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Gorb@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Humans and mysticism is pretty much a fact of life you can't separate the two. Most people will have their own personal set of rituals that don't have any basis in material reality but are done anyway for comfort and trying to feel some level of control in a chaotic world. I don't really see the importance of focusing on one specific kind of mysticism and correlating it to feminism it doesn't really make any sense to me. The fact that some people like astrology doesn't prevent or interfere with feminism they're not contradictory.

An aggressive dislike of it is more of a red flag to me tbh. I have my own silly little rituals I do to make me feel better. If I believe an item I have gives me good luck and I take it with me when I go outside am I now not a marxist because i hold contradictory beliefs between political ideology and the concept of luck? I don't think so

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thallo@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think Philosophy Tube has a video about witchcraft and Marxism which explains the connection.

Should be similar to tarot.

One reason women, in particular, flock to it is because it's already a woman centered space. Witchcraft is anti-patriarchy and anti-hegemony, so Marxists would find that aspect appealing.

Also, as an aside, there's an old book on Wicca from the 70s called A Witch's Bible by Janet and Stewart Farrar, which at one point encourages readers to study Marxism and Dialectical Materialism, because the underlying spiritual philosophy of witchcraft is very dialectical. And I think that's pretty cool

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This isn't necessarily related to the feminism part of your question, but I've read some about modern day Daoist divination practices in China that are essentially like tarot cards. One book (The Souls of China by Ian Johnson) had an interesting perspective because some of the priests said there wasn't any magic involved and they weren't literally predicting the future. At least in that context, people have specific questions they want answered, and they have answers that they want. The divination only provides yes/no answers.

Someone asking if they're going to be successful some day isn't helped in any way by saying "nah sorry you'll be poor forever" nor are they helped by saying "yea you'll be a hollywood star" and having their ego inflated, but what they're looking for is some sort of comfort that their life won't always be miserable or meaningless.

So the priest guides them through their questions like a conversation and tries to give them the comfort they're looking for in the least harmful way possible. The yarrow root (or tarot cards, or whatever) are just the vehicle to have that conversation. You can say maybe that person should just go to a therapist, and maybe they should, but essentially the priest is trying to help people work through whatever issue it is they're having so they can come to some sort of resolution. And that's a role that existed before the contemporary therapist.

The idea is then that the 'prediction' part is just that person resolving to act in a way that would make it true. So if they ask if they'll be successful, the priest guides them to some sort of action they can do to work toward that goal.

I can see people wanting to use stuff like new age astrology and tarot and all that kind of stuff in a similar way, but the difference is that unfortunately, the person conducting those ceremonies may not have those good intentions in mind or any sort of philosophical, cultural, or ethical training to guide people to beneficial actions. They're not a community figure invested in the lives of the people talking to them, but a fortune teller with a building in the middle of town just advertising their services to random people for profit.

EDIT: As to how I feel about it, I obviously don't believe in it but I try not to bash it too much unless that person uses it as an excuse to be discriminatory or justify their bad decisions. Especially in more ingrained cultural contexts like the above, but even for the 'fairies and tarot' folks.

[–] GayTuckerCarlson@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago
[–] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I just see it as a way some people of all genders try to fill the space left by religion. It doesn't necessarily have to be coded as an activity exclusive to one gender. I know plenty of guys into stuff like that. I've heard others describe this phenomenon as a way to question the accuracy of outcomes predicted by the secularization thesis.

Regardless, I still am diplomatic with people who like that stuff, despite me not believing in it. I don't want to come off the same way the New Atheists did when discussing religion. That sort of militant attitude can be off-putting when trying to make the case for socialism.

I'd say the best way to discourage taking such practices too seriously, I'd suggest deconstructing such practices by reading about it's history. Understanding the history of a topic helps one realize the fallible and changing nature of a supposedly unchanging process for discerning truth. I use the same approach with religion

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago (8 children)

This "space left by religion" shit never made sense to me. Is that a thing other people/normal people/neurotypicals actually experience?

[–] Philosophosphorous@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago

i'm definitely not neurotypical and have had some wild experiences that lead me to ontological inquiry, the insinuation that 'lmao only normies do that not me i'm so much better and above it all' is pretty toxic imo

[–] ped_xing@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have you read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_far_future? I showed it to somebody who left religion decades earlier and could see what a gut punch it still was. I think he had basically substituted indefinite space exploration for heaven and finding out that even that's not an option was like losing faith a second time.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago

Future events more distant than the entirety of human civilization are filed firmly under Not My Problem

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jolliver_bromwell@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

im way more concerned with people glazing the woke pope and liberation theology as proto communism than I am somebody doing a birth chart, idk.

[–] RiotDoll@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

i think shunting off non rational belief into a category of "bullshit not worth exploring or interrogating" is kind of, i dunno, itself ignorant? you can at least take the approach of people who study these matters academically, and separate your ego and emotional responses from the equation and seek to actually, not just approximating marx fourth hand, actually try to understand the phenomenon before jumping to this kind of shit.

astrology fits this category for me - it's not remotely productive for anyone to silo yourselves off from understanding for a lack of "getting it" - you're not omniscient, there's shit you don't know. Human tendencies towards these phenomena, whether imaginal or real, and you already know what you think about that, are not something to just go "lol i dont get it fuck all that noise" because you wanna actually reach people and find common cause with them, you refusing and even being hostile to this shit is gonna lose people who might, despite your assumptions, be radically useful.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago

Astrology is for fun, I truly don't think it's any deeper than that

[–] Philosophosphorous@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

i call myself a marxist and a communist because i agree with marx's analysis and critique of capitalism, and other marxist and adjacent theorists critiques of imperialism and advocacy for democratic centralism. i largely agree with historical materialism as a means of analysis, but i'm just not sold on strict ontological or epistemological materialism, in the sense of eliminativist physicalist realism. i have yet to be convinced out of epistemological nihilism and metaphysical/ontological agnosticism. obviously any specific beliefs like astrology or solipsistic idealism without any empirical evidence or epistemological basis are probably BS, but it would be foolish to assume we know basically everything about reality imo.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Not to mention that western materialism erases or dismisses indigenous peoples', and for that matter, any non-western forms of knowledge. This is colonialist in nature, and reinforces the patriarcal, objectivist, project that is the social institution "science".

What we call "facts" are politically loaded notions, and what we accept as fact and fiction reflects the power imbalances of an already unequal and oppressive society. So, thinking that our knowledge is complete only through western, objectivist ways of knowing, is to tacitly accept the power structures that led to it being dominant in the first place.

[–] thetaT@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

First of all, how does materialism "dismiss and erase" indigenous knowledge? Most materialists (Marxists) are in favor of recording, recovering, and rejuvenating indigenous culture and knowledge. Those who aren't, are anti-Marxist and should not be taken seriously. That being said, a rejection of materialism and science like this is also completely nonsensical and is an attack on the very fabric of Marxism and Scientific Socialism.

Yes, I ageee - something being accepted as "fact" can be used to reinforce oppressive power structures, such as patriarchy, slavery, etc. - however, using this as justification to reject science, materialism, and "objectivism" makes no sense. Pseudoscience like eugenics and other forms of "scientific" racism were used (and are still being used) to reinforce horrible oppressive and colonial power structures. But using the horrors commited as a result of pseudoscience - which is a rejection of actual science in favor of theories that lack proper evidence and are not backed by any real science, as cause to reject science, is self-contradictory and oxymoronic.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whogivesashit@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago

This thread has so many ridiculous takes. Also I keep laughing at just how much of an obvious foreshadowing the title of this post was "Feminism and Astrology".

Like that feels like it comes straight out of reddit lmao.

[–] CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Having been close friends with someone who's way into astrology, I think there's a number of factors here.

Firstly, in a world that is clearly 'going wrong', with ever increasing economic precarity, political polarization, and visible worsening of climate change, the idea of a system than can give you any level of prediction for your personal future is a huge comfort. Marxism, despite being a scientific discipline that makes very accurate long-term predictions of social development, has no (or very little) power on the individual level, so some people may cling to this other system that gives them a sense of preparedness for their personal life. And while I agree that truly understanding and internalizing a dialectical-materialist perspective means both an end to being able to believe in things like astrology, and a kind of inner peace in the face of the inevitable dialectical unfolding of the material world, most people (who are still valuable allies) never actually reach that level of understanding.

Secondly, as people are increasingly alienated and atomized, it provides access to a large social space of overwhelmingly non-straight-white-cis-male people, immediately gives you a tribe with specific traits and icons to identify with, has (at the very least, the aesthetic of) a deep history going back to antiquity and has a lot of specific in-jokes that can quickly bring someone into the fold. My friend is constantly posting memes about the supposed characteristics of various different star signs, sub-categories of those star signs, interactions between different star signs, etc. etc. It's an endless source of, for want of a better word, content, which you can enjoy both as part of the space as a whole and from within your specific niche. You can see something and say "Yes, I am like that! They know me so well!", or "Ah, you got me! I do that too!", or "Oh, those [star sign]! That's exactly how they are!", all of which binds you into a social fabric and identity that rarely exists elsewhere.

And thirdly, through the supposed 'compatibility' of different star signs, it gives people a guide to who they should try to form a relationship with. Statistically, by far the number one danger to women is their male romantic partners, both in terms of physical violence but also in terms of the possibility of psychic distress. Will he dump me? Will he cheat on me? Will he leave me to do all the house work? He seems like a good guy now, but is he just tricking me until he thinks I'm stuck with him? Does he secretly listen to Andrew Tate? Will he start doing that a year into our relationship and suddenly completely change? There's no way to know these things, and under patriarchal capitalism men are under constant social pressure to gain these behaviors and traits. So a system that claims to give even the slightest insight into who you can trust to be a good partner offers a huge psychological comfort.

[–] HauntedBySpectacle@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

And thirdly, through the supposed 'compatibility' of different star signs, it gives people a guide to who they should try to form a relationship with. Statistically, by far the number one danger to women is their male romantic partners, both in terms of physical violence but also in terms of the possibility of psychic distress. Will he dump me? Will he cheat on me? Will he leave me to do all the house work? He seems like a good guy now, but is he just tricking me until he thinks I'm stuck with him? Does he secretly listen to Andrew Tate? Will he start doing that a year into our relationship and suddenly completely change?

What's the point of a guide with an irrational basis? It seems deeply dangerous to me to try to answer these questions based on the timing of someone's birth. Sure, there's no 100% reliable way to answer these questions, but there have to be better methods than literal mysticism. Like say, investigating what his friends are like.

I understand that people find comfort in beliefs, but the idea that you can trust someone based on the alignments of stars and planets is so wild to me. And that goes for conventional religion too. I don't think most Christians or Muslims feel these sorts of questions can be answered simply by knowing the other person is also a believer. If they did, I think they would be making a mistake. You can be hurt by people who fit the right "type", or who share the same beliefs as you. Find comfort in what you want, I suppose, but basing trust in people off of spiritual belief can have catastrophic results. like abuse in cults

These responses describing astrology as just a psychological comfort or even as entertainment, equating it with using the internet or playing a game, seem to ignore that the repeated practice of a belief can instill that belief, and that true belief impels you to act based on that belief. Lots of people treat astrology as just a fun fantasy to discuss, and I really have no problem with that. But truly believing in it and acting on it seems not only not Marxist, but more importantly a risky and misleading way to live life. If we don't embrace irrational reasons for making political decisions, why should they be embraced for making personal decisions?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›