this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
-24 points (18.4% liked)

Conservative

357 readers
96 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

It's a direct video of her saying this. Don't try to deny it.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda like when Trump said "take the guns first, go through due process second" back in 2018

Kind of makes you wonder why everyone on his golf course isn't open carrying since it'll make the whole situation safer? They should issue one at the front if you're not strapped.

When have more guns ever been a bad thing?

[–] Alice@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 2 hours ago

Interesting. Hello Mr. Kaboom, haven't seen you in a while

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Got a clip that isn't 14p and ideally shows her face?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago

She definitely said this, in 2007, when describing a law passed in San Francisco requiring the safe storage and handling of guns in the city. The law did not lead to any surprise inspections of the homes of gun owners, and the law has withstood several challenges in every level of the courts. It's pretty clear to me from context and how the law was enforced that she was speaking about the right to privacy vs the responsibility to follow the law. She was not actually threatening to enter homes without cause and inspect anyone's gun safe, although I can understand why it is being interpreted that way (especially by those motivated to create attack ads).

There was also a provision in the same bill prohibiting gun storage in public housing, but that was ruled unconstitutional in 2009.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 8 hours ago

Make sure she has the right number of fingers too. Just saying...