this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3023 readers
227 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 hours ago

How old is that dickhead again? Only 60? What a shame.

[–] Emperor 26 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I presume someone in the picture library has a folder of photos of him looking like a smug toad because sometimes he has a fag or a pint in the way, so you can't see properly.

[–] HumanPenguin 13 points 9 hours ago

I find it hard to imagine him looking any other way.

If it looks like etc.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't this [regime] whore take Russian money?

[–] flamingos 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, whores work for their money unlike this waste of sperm.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 7 hours ago
[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Get the auditors in to go through their finances.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What the fuck? How is this even possible? You can just start a company and have it run in an election in the UK? That's bizarre.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 5 points 8 hours ago

It's more that they chose to run the party finances as a company. The company itself cannot compete in elections as a candidate and does not get representation at parliament.

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's a first. Bizarre=scummy attempt to avoid responsibility

Pretty sure it's a case of he found a loophole that allows him to avoid claiming his own fiscal status, using the independence of the company to avoid claiming personnel donations as party donations.

But that's just a guess based on him being a smug toad in general.

EDIT: Also, that likely only worked until he became an MP. As an actual representative, the separation would be non-advantageous. What with acts in parliment being covered by parliamentary procedure, not legal jurisdiction.