this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024

148 points (99.3% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15912 readers

301 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

KiaKaha@hexbear.net

wantonviolins@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

VILenin@hexbear.net

blashork@hexbear.net

replaceable@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

CARCOSA@hexbear.net

148

This is massive "A vote for Bart is a vote for anarchy" energy, except far more powerful. (i.redd.it)

submitted 1 month ago by UlyssesT@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

sicko-wistful

all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He SO badly wants to be oppressed.

[+] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

[deleted]

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's almost like when they say "Christianity" what they mean is "white people" and it is just thinly veiled racism...

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Secularism is the direct consequence of this new autonomy of civil society, for entire areas of social life are, henceforth, conceivable independendy of one another. The need to satisfy metaphysical yearnings is left to individual conscience, and religion loses its status as a force of formal constraint. Contrary to a widespread Eurocentric preconception, however, secularism is not peculiar to Christian society, which demanded its liberation from the heavy yoke of the church. Nor is it the result of the conflict between the "national" state and a church with a universal vocation. For during the Reformation, the church is in fact "national" in its various forms--Anglican, Lutheran, and so forth. Nevertheless, the new fusion of church and state does not produce a new theocracy, but rather, one might say, a religious secularism. Secularism, even though the reactionary ecclesiastical forces fought it, did not root out belief. It even, perhaps, reinforced it in the long run, by freeing it of its formalist and mythological straightjackets. Christians of our time, whether or not they are intellectuals, have no problem accepting that humankind descended from apes and not from Adam and Eve.

Samir Amin, Eurocentrism, The Decline of Metaphysics and the Reinterpretation of Religion.

[+] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That's the thing, by religion losing it's place as the arbitrator of certain social norms and by being able to believe in modern Christianity while not having to accept nonsense beliefs (like the world being created in 7 days and being 6000 years old, denying the existence of evolution, extreme homophobia and sexism, being able to wear a "satanic" outfit without being excommunicated from Christianity like Musk did here) belief in religion, paticularly this new kind of Christianity can actually be reinforced.

The quote even checks out in my personal experience. I'm a closeted bisexual, and the church being homophobic and forcing that belief on us was a big reason I left the church and became an atheist as a teenager. The other big part was the denial of science. I couldn't accept that nonsense from them. However, I am meeting LGBT people a few years younger than me who are religious and still go to church, as it's a more accepting environment for them at the particular churches they attend. Thinking back, if I had gone to a more accepting church as a child, a church that accepted the scientific reality of evolution, the big bang, etc and was accepting of LGBT people, would I be an atheist today? Honestly, probably not, I probably would've stayed a Christian.

[+] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Going to drop another Samir Amin quote about that phrase in particular.

Nevertheless, another reading can be made of Marx. The often cited phrase--"religion is the opium of the people"--is truncated. What follows this remark lets it be understood that human beings need opium, because they are metaphysical animals who cannot avoid asking themselves questions about the meaning of life. They give what answers they can, either adopting those offered by religion or inventing new ones, or else they avoid worrying about them.

In any case, religions are part of the picture of reality and even constitute an important dimension of it. It is, therefore, important to analyze their social function, and in our modern world their articulation with what currendy constitutes modernity: capitalism, democracy, and secularism.

Techbros and bazinga defeatists are firmly in the "inventing new ones" category. Even in your example, they are acting as if the new technology is some all powerful, inevitable, unstoppable force ~~from above~~ so they may as well ~~worship it~~ cheer on this technological progress. They have essentially in a way, reinvented the concept of God.

[+] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I lost count of how many people I've met that saw "progress" as some Civ game style bar that only crawled upward toward specific goal milestones.

As much as I love the series, Civilization has done irreparable harm to the public's understanding of history and how technology develops. People seriously think you can just invent saddles for horseback riding even if you're in a place without horses. G*mers are going to need serious re-education after the revolution.

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ahh the idealistic idea that change/adjustment/progress is both inevitable and always positive. You're going to hate me for this, but Samir Amin had something to say about that too.

The fact that these adjustments can be positive or negative argues in favor of an interpretation of historical materialism based on the concept of "under-determination." I mean by this that each of the various levels of reality (economic, political, ideological) contains its own internal logic, and because of this the complementary nature of their evolution, which is necessary to ensure the overall coherence of a system, does not define in advance a given direction for a particular evolution.

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Under late-stage capitalism, we have so many opium options available now, both literal and metaphorical.

[–] CupcakeOfSpice@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

CW suicidal thoughts, kind of a long rant

I struggle some with this because when I was young, I was taught to weave together every aspect of who I was with the church, then essentially told every part that was me was evil and rotten while every part that was the church was perfect and unassailable. Trying to separate myself from the church or faith often felt like (and often added up to) suicide. So I've mever really been able to fully separate for those reasons, then add in a psychotic disorder with frequent religious delusions and I'm a mess. I believe in Jesus, but I try to keep away from the science denial and queer-phobia. (personally am trans, but that was a long and painful process of discovery) I also try to let other people believe what they believe. If faith is an opium to me, then I am direly addicted to it with no way out I can see. But I'm trying to still be a good human while believing in a faith that all too often oppresses and suppresses other folks, identities, faiths, and cultures.

[–] g_g@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

uhm so this whole time I thought it was an iron man costume

like I thought he was riffing on being the real tony stark hell i've even seen this full picture before and I guess my brain just filled in the iron man parts

bizarre wtf is this actually?

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Blasphemy is blue haired atheist baristas not my armor that looks like it belongs to satan.

[–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

Real Christ-heads know that blasphemy is robbing people of their livelihoods (mass layoffs), adultery (tries to have kids with each woman he meets), and refusing to aid the poor (could end poverty in US, instead climbs into rich-man's space race)