Judges being responsible to the public, and gaining their mandate through popular election is anti-democracy. Lol'd at the comments of the US Ambassador.
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)
World News
2231 readers
207 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
The reform faced a rare and stinging critique from US Ambassador Ken Salazar in Mexico City, in which he called the election of judges “a major risk to the functioning of Mexico’s democracy.”
CNN is so reich-wing now that they think that's a "stinging critique"
the thought process is: "electing judges is bad because there is a risk that incompetent people get elected". As if we had competent judges right now lmao.
not like there's a precedent for unelected courts to have ideological tendencies that contravene popular opinion amirite
Like the current state of affairs in Mexico
US Ambassador Ken Salazar in Mexico City, in which he called the election of judges “a major risk to the functioning of Mexico’s democracy.” Cope more Ken!
its a major risk for sure, now the judges won't rule out in favor, every single time, of international companies!
Would be based as hell if almo brought back attendance democracy (without thr slaves)
Lmao, my autocorrect. I meant athenian