this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
779 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

1555 readers
666 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 124 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Only the salary ranges for a position become public. They aren’t going to publish what they pay each employee.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago (3 children)

And if it’s anything like California the ranges will be useless. My salary β€œrange” is quoted as $80k - $170k. Real fucking useless.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

so you get paid $80k right?

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

$81K because they have 5 years experience in a technology that has been out for 3 years.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 18 points 2 months ago

My salary is between $1 and $10000000

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

I've looked at some California ranges. They tend to be well below what levels.fyi claims these companies pay (I'm thinking Netflix, Microsoft, Google).

I'm assuming they lowball the range in the ad so if they get a candidate that doesn't fit the original criteria they were thinking of but they still want to onboard, they can pay less. If they get a candidate that they really like, maybe they'll pay more? I know we're supposed to be all doom and gloom here, but there's plenty of folks making ludicrous salaries in tech.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thats true, you can ask the average salary for the role within the firm though. Having seen the pisstaking done in America with ranges, they got out ahead of it.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Netflix Salary Range: $3.50 to $900,000

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Salary range: Illegal - Fantasy

[–] Technofrood 2 points 2 months ago

I assume there may be some cutoff point, but what if you have a low number of people in the role say for example 2. Wouldn't that be pretty much narrowing it down to being per employee?

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago (20 children)

Interesting..... Look forward to seeing how it goes. Hope the gender pay gap does collapse but I'd say we are still a generation of workers away from that being a reality.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Knowing what your coworkers are getting paid lets you know how much you can reasonably ask for.

And knowing what folks at the job down the street make means you can quickly determine whether its worth the trouble to find a new job.

Also probably doesn't hurt to know what the folks upstairs are making when you're deciding whether to form a union.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Gender pay gap uncorrected for working hours, position, ...? Or the corrected one?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] anzo@programming.dev 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I wonder if this could help the IT workers from the public sector in Germany (E12, around 2500 €/month).

Anyone knows why it is like that?

Once, I heard about some speculative extra amounts made by guarantees in purchases. (Germans love guarantees, and any hardware purchase has a 50% surplus that can easily be split 1:1 between vendor and whoever was in charge. Yes, it would be illegal.. But nearly impossible to prove.)

[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

I work in the Dutch public sector in IT, but with a few years of experience, I'm already beyond 4k/mo.

Sounds like the union isn't pulling it's weight...

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 13 points 2 months ago

In this case the Unions and HRs rigidity could be part of the problem.

They tend to make groups based on formal qualifiaction. E.g. all trade apprentices get similiar salaries, all trade masters, all bachelor degrees and all master degrees (simplified).

So a person with just a formal trade apprentice, but great experience and proven know-how will still get a much lower salary than a recently graduates business degree "idiot" who mostly managed to study based on his parents pushing him through.

I've seen Job ads for cloud experts, who are supposed to organize an infrastructure over multiple data centres, running hundreds of different services in a heightened security environment offered around 3k. The Operations people said that this does not need a masters degree, because they didn't want to filter out all the self taught people, and then HR and the Union reps said this is a trade level position so it gets a trade level salary.

From what i understood with the complexity of the IT landscape they would have needed to offer more around 6-7k to find people.

[–] seapat@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

You're net salary is beyond 4k? Are you hiring?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Why net all of the sudden?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Those jobs exist, and are hiring. My company (US-based, Software, between 1k and 10k employees) is hiring architects in Germany (anywhere, 100% remote) for significantly over 4k net. Starting salary is over 100k, plus a nice RSU package (4 year vest with 1 year cliff). Other similar companies offer comparable compensation packages.

We do require a quite wide tech knowledge and good communication (customer interaction is part of the job, sometimes public speaking). It is not as relaxed as public sector, tho, most weeks are over 40h. Some traveling required, too.

If anyone is interested feel free to ping me (full disclosure: Iget a 5k USD referral bonus if you get hired and pass the Probezeit).

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Got the knowledge I think, but not the spunk for the hours. You wouldn't hire 4 days a week would you :-) ?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not the hiring manager, but as far as I know we don't hire part time :(

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Thanks anyways πŸ˜‰ !

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Ping. Contact me via PM please.

[–] seapat@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It's gross, not net. The net amount is like 3200.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Melchior@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

E12 starts at 4.170,32 € gross and up to rises 6.516,74 € depending on experience. That is gross. That is for a job, which is low stress and you can not be fired unless you pretty much commit a crime on the workplace.

[–] Scribbd@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe government IT in Germany is low stress. Maybe the average in my country is also. But my department surely isn't low stress. Could be because I work at a research institute that has been leading the charge into public cloud?

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

There's also the possibility that the definition of stress differs. I'm in an IT position where I control most of my schedule and pace of work, I work at home without much supervision, and I'm very much a trusted employee. That means I have less body stress and other stresses than a large amount of people, but at the end of the day my mental stress can still give me headaches and wear me out (and of course real life stresses. I'm paid pretty well for the company I work at, but it's still kinda low to be supporting myself and a family member still trying to find employment).

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Here in Washington State it has had some effect. At my work, we had many people leave because their salary wasn't on the high side of the range even though they were more senior. We also had hiccups in hiring because candidates come in asking for the high end salary but then their experience is abysmal to say the least. But then you train this person for 2 or 3 years for them to actually be of any use, and they leave because now they got something to chase a higher salary with. A small company can't afford to raise salaries all the time, specially if it's for people who are in training and don't even know it. Anyway, to give you a clue, if you fuck up like 5 times and nobody gives a shit, you're still in training. However, if you think you're gonna fuck up and upper management call a meeting to discuss the status, then you should probably ask for a raise.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Oh but back to the topic. It's good! And you don't have to wait for the government to divulge it. You can legally tell anyone how much you make. And you should do that. Specially to younger people.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Article 9.5 of this directive leaves the door open for each country to decide whether or not to require companies with fewer than 100 employees […] to publish this information.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί