this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
30 points (91.7% liked)

Apple

17455 readers
63 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Strategically this might be a good time. Enough people have been waiting for USB C to flatten out any drop to demand from the pricing.

[–] GloopTamer@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

But don’t they increase the price every year

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

With rising costs everywhere, this is another opportunity for Apple to take another chunk of money.

With a base markup of 119%, Apple could probably hit as high 140% without much backlash from loyalists.

[–] djsaskdja@endlesstalk.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as they don’t touch the base model, I don’t have any issue with them increasing the price of the pro. The day I can’t get a new iPhone for $800 or less is the day I find a different phone to use.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s funny since the base iPhone 12 and 13 were $829, then the 14 dropped back to $799.

They go up and down, just mostly up $50 every few generations. The base model that is according to MacTracker.

Which the iPhone 11 was $699. So the jump from 11-12 was $129. Can’t remember if there was that much of a stink about it but probably was.

[–] djsaskdja@endlesstalk.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The base iPhone 12 and 13 was the mini which were both sold for less than $800. And I owned them both. Using my 13 mini to type this reply.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know if you can call the mini the base model. It’s not available every generation and is a special model like the SE.

[–] djsaskdja@endlesstalk.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What feature does the standard 12 and 13 have that the mini models don’t? The SE makes compromises all over the keep the price down. So it’s not a straight comparison.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well the iPhone 14 exists but the 14 mini does not. It did have similar features sans general size, battery etc, but it needs to be available to be a “base” model.

Other than that it’s just a generational one off product like the plus, SE, or XR models.

[–] djsaskdja@endlesstalk.org 2 points 1 year ago

The iPhone 14 is under $800. You just said it’s $799.

[–] Nogami@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Disposable income is an awesome thing isn't it?

[–] nowaybehind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am really not sure Apple can do another bump in Europe. Compared to the US the prices already increased significantly the past few years.

[–] tahoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Considering how well they’ve sold even with the price bumps, it’s clear that people don’t care and Apple knows it

[–] kiddblur@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I swear I've been reading this rumor for 3+ years at this point

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

And it has been true every time.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing the pro models are a much smaller market share, so they're trying to get a bigger bang for their buck.