this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
39 points (97.6% liked)

UK Politics

3096 readers
341 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sunak will be feeling the pressure from this if inflation doesn't actually come down.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snacks 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

sunak has zero control over interest rates, (or inflation) but hes said specifically he will bring inflation down. he tried to take credit for something entirely out of his control, gambling with peoples futures and its blown up in his stupid face. The entire G7 is about half what we are seeing. As an investment banker he knows perfectly well the BoE has independent power over rates, and that they also have limited power over inflation.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. Ultimately this is the BoE's fault for not acting faster and harder. Interest rates would still have gone up but the pain may have been less severe.

Sunak was a fool for trying to take credit for Inflation. He based it on the optimistic predictions that inflation would rapidly come under control and improve towards the end of the year. Instead inflation is not shifting, and interest rates are likely to need to stay higher for longer and probably go up further, plus we're now realistically looking at a potential recession.

Sunak is out of his depth, and it's yet another poor leader in a run of 4 now (May, Johnson, Truss) showing how depleted the Conservative party is of talent and any sort of vision.

[–] snacks 6 points 1 year ago

id argue Cameron was also piss poor, albeit a much more pragmatic centrist. His decision to allow the brexit kettle to boil is one of the fundamental reasons we are in this utter shitshow; half the labour force has gone, and the local British workers wont work for peanuts hence huge wage inflation. Ok granted not even Cameron could have forseen how bad it is, but thats no consolation when he also slashed the public sector to bits, and they all now absolutely need a pay rise too. Argh

[–] noodle 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly, he made a promise he will not be able to deliver. It will almost certainly come back to bite him in the next year. The general public are not financially literate enough to understand inflation in the first place.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Which makes why he'd make that mistake even more ridiculous.

Unless he was as good an IB as he is PM ofc...

[–] Haily@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

@snacks

@noodle Technically he could take away the BOA’s independence if he truly wanted to, I believe Liz Truss threatened to do exactly that when they were fighting her tax plans, but the markets probably wouldn’t like it if he did. It’s weird to think that not so very long ago, politicians having complete control over interest rates was entirely normal.

[–] Patch 2 points 1 year ago

I read one interesting take that his promise may even have made inflation worse, as some economic actors will have made investment decisions based on an assumption that inflation would half (pushing up inflation further).

I'm not actually that sold on that theory, but it's an interesting angle.

[–] _HR_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

sunak has zero control over interest rates, (or inflation) but hes said specifically he will bring inflation down.

Not quite. Inflation can be caused from the supply side, and from the demand side. While inflation caused by the demand side (covid stimulus) could only be addressed by BoE rates, the inflation caused by supply side (covid disruptions in supply chain, followed by Russia → Ukraine war hitting energy prices, and continuous problems arising from brexit) is something that he could influence.

So, to sum it up, he has partial influence over the inflation, and in addition to what he could control about the supply side of inflation, he was betting that BoE would be doing a better job controlling the demand side of inflation.

[–] ckempo 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Christ. Glad I'm fixed for the next four years but that's no solace for those affected on trackers etc.

[–] mannycalavera@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same here. Although I distinctly remember my mortgage provider asking us if we were comfortable if the interest rate went up. Multiple times. I'm pretty sure they "stress tested" our mortgage payments assuming 9 - 10% interest. Of course we told them it would be hard, but still within our budgets then laughed and said it would never happen.

I've got sympathy for people in this situation for sure... but how have they managed their household budgets and savings such that this is a shock to them? Or have they over stretched themselves with their mortgage?

[–] GreatAlbatross 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember looking at the 10% stress test on the paperwork and thinking "oof", but feeling a bit safer that people are at least being made aware of this when they take out a mortgage.

This was brought in last year to change the way stress testing on applicants runs. Previously, you had to be able to withstand 7% (iirc, don't quote me), it's now a 1% rise stress test, though the 4.5x salary limits still apply.

[–] mannycalavera@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

AHH interesting that makes more sense then because we remortgaged before those changes in the rules.

As an example, a borrower taking out a two-year fixed-rate mortgage at 2.2% with a revert to rate of 4% would need to show they could afford the monthly repayments on a rate of 7%.

I mean... they ain't going to be coming off onto the 4% 🥲 but stress testing at 7% should still (for the time being) mean that everyone with a mortgage should have been aware of the risks and budgeted accordingly. No?

No-one wants to pay more of course.... I have sympathy for that. I just don't understand the shock that some people are claiming.

[–] Ni@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately our 5 year fixed is ending in the next couple of months, brilliant timing. Tried to apply for a remortgage and the offer was pulled before they processed the application. Great timing!

[–] BenGFHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can someone smart explain this to an A-level econ student?

The inflation we're seeing is mostly imported cost push, from rising energy prices, cost of raw materials ect, which interest rates should have marginal impact on, no?

The IR is used to impact AD and change demand pull inflation, and is risen to lower investment and consumption and therefor DP inflation, which appears to already be very low.

Why is the BoE increasing IR to counter inflation that isn't demand driven? Is it just to make it look like they're doing something or am I dumb?

[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

An answer from my wife who works in UK finance and spent the better part of the day dealing with this decision:

_The short answer is, this is still the best tool they have to deal with inflation, but it's a blunt tool.

A lot of the inflation is driven by external factors, but part of what they're trying to do, it prevent an inflation spiral where higher energy and food prices feed into a higher cost of other goods... labour... Etc.

Q: Will it work?
Her A: At this point they are very late [as others have said here] and increasingly looks like the only way this works is if they hike rates to a level that forces a recession [yay /s]._

[–] FarceOfWill@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe if mortgage payments are twice as high people won't be able to spend as much on anything else and inflation will fall just because less is being spent on food etc??

I'm not clear on how the inflation stats work when modelling the amount of items people buy Vs the price of the basket.

[–] pre@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

@BenGFHC
They only have one button. Their choice is to press it or not press it. So they press it when inflation is high. You could get a robot to do it. They know it won't work, might even make it worse, but they have no other buttons to press.