this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
161 points (98.8% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2661 readers
2 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] comrade19@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, messages or posts, both past and future. With this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute. NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tacitly allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. FACEBOOK DOES NOT HAVE MY PERMISSION TO SHARE PHOTOS OR MESSAGES.”

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

Facebook, "Then get the fuck off my property."

This is it. Same shit for driving on roads as a sov cit. Government, "Then get the fuck off my property."

Oh, but thatt's different, somehow. Roads are naturally occurring, self-maintaining, and for the natural man to enjoy. /s

[–] Addition1291@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Whenever I see these I make a comment on how these are spread by evil hacker men so that tech illiterate rubes self-identity.

I don't know if that's actually true but it sure got the boomers on my feed to stop posting this bullshit for a while.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Oh, you think they're done? Clearly there's more coming.

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 43 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What is it about lead poisoning that causes this handwriting style?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Look, the guy has a hard enough time remembering the letters, and copying the words from his "reminder card." His brain is already taxed! Give him a break.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

taxed

Now I see why they avoid taxes so hard.

[–] rubikcuber 40 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

NO LIBILITY was my favorite.

[–] rubikcuber 5 points 4 months ago
[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

To the Postmaster General? Isn't that a US federal position?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 25 points 4 months ago

Someone should set up an alternative state-citizen (or whatever) Postmaster General, assuring these people that they are the one legitimate one because (insert pseudolegal mumbo-jumbo here) and, for a monthly fee (payable in advance, real cash only), they will handle their complaints and send them back encouraging replies about legal actions they’re initiating against the “fraudsters” in admiralty court.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Never ask a Mennonite why it's ok to use car springs on their horse buggies.

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago

No Libility

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago

All that writing for nothing since none of it is anywhere near a 45 degree angle. That's how you unlock the power of those words.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So a 5 second google shows the law firm exists. Why does he say it doesn’t?

[–] cowfodder@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Because he's an idiot.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Sovcits believe the "case" of the name makes a difference..

Most likely they don't want to pay their debts and are being sued.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 19 points 4 months ago

NO LIBILITY

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

LMFAO zero chances this guy doesn't make this shit his entire personality

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If a customer gave me this back to return with all this shit all over it, I'd tell them I couldn't accept it. This is essentially defacing the mail in my book. I'll give them a solution to their problem and tell them to remove their mailbox, that way I won't have to deal with that nutjob anymore.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The fact that he doesn't understand is a 100% guarantee.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Even if this was a valid tactic, does this person not realise the person on the other side would actually need to be able to read what is written for them to action anything?

Not everyone has nice handwriting (I sure don't), but you should at least try to actually be legible - that bit in the middle is just barely legible to someone actually trying to read what it says.


Also, not everyone who sends mail to you has to have a contract with you (and certainly not an international contract), especially not for a summons. This kind of letter isn't asking you nicely, it's telling you what"s gonna happen, and you better listen.

[–] clb92@feddit.dk 10 points 4 months ago

Relevant Tom Scott video "How the US Postal Service reads terrible handwriting" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxCha4Kez9c

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

I have a funny feeling the person who wrote that didn’t do too well at school and that’s the best handwriting they can pull off.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Gurfaild@feddit.de 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

I find it funny that they are banned in Russia, when Putin's entire goal is returning to Russian Empire.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I had the same thought in my head when I first heard the term. But no, "Sov" is for "sovereign".